Restoration
From Salish Sea Wiki
- Effort References
- Wiki Rules
- Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
- Please adhere to our Social Contract and Style Guide
- Complain here, and be nice.
Restoration is a kind of Effort whereby people aid in the recovery ecosystem structure, processes and functions. Restoration depends on Funding and Education, coordination with Land Use management of Infrastructure as well as understanding the Socioeconomics that motivate action. Furthermore restoration is strongly shaped by Landform and embraces many topics of Ecology. Many pages and documents are associated with the restoration category. 'Restoration' is used here in the broadest sense, to include all efforts that aim to increase historical ecosystem services.
The following pages provides overviews of different restoration settings:
High-Level Restoration Pages
Lessons Learned
The following pages are flagged as restoration lessons learned:
- Baker et al 2016 estuary restoration lessons learned
- Boyd 2013 fisher slough monitoring lessons
- Boyd 2016 hat slough & fisher slough lessons learned
- Cereghino 2015 accelerating estuary restoration
- Floodplain Permit Streamlining Workgroup for Nooksack
- Friebel 2016 fir island farms lessons learned
- Meidev & Neslon 2016 qwuloolt lessons learned
- Shreffler et al 2008 jimmycomelately lessons learned
- SRFB 2019 large project barriers
- Standard Conservation Project Description
- TNC 2013 fisher slough lessons learned
- TNC 2014 fir island farms restoration lessons learned
Restoration Efforts By Region
7 Efforts in South Puget Sound
- Deschutes Estuary Restoration Project
- Biocultural Restoration of Riverscape Forests and Wetlands With Agroforestry
- Plants for the People Nursery
- Red Salmon Slough Restoration
- Nisqually Refuge Restoration
- Evaluating Salmon Rearing Limitations in River Deltas
- Country Club Road Stream Crossing at Green Cove Creek
One Effort in Hood Canal
42 Efforts in Whidbey Basin
- Fisher Slough Restoration
- Milltown Island Restoration
- Island Unit Estuary Restoration
- Wiley Slough Restoration
- Fir Island Farm Restoration
- Union Slough Restoration
- Qwuloolt Restoration
- Smith Island Restoration
- Swinomish Slough Restoration
- Leque Island Restoration
- Port Susan Restoration
- Zis a Ba Restoration
- Evaluating Salmon Rearing Limitations in River Deltas
- Snohomish Delta Ecosystem Monitoring and Evaluation
- Mid-spencer Island Restoration
- Blue Heron Mitigation Bank
- Marysville Mitigation Site
- Everett Marshlands Restoration
- Spencer Island Restoration
- Jim Creek Channel Enhancement
- Skykomish Habitat Mitigation Bank
- Sno-Stilly Riparian Zone Management Strategy
- Lower Snohomish Reach Scale Plan
- Everett Riverfront Wetlands
- Maulsby Mudflat Reconnection and Restoration
- Lower Skykomish Floodplain Design
- Haskell Slough Protection and Restoration
- Lower Skykomish Reach Scale Plan
- Culvert Replacement Regulatory Coordination
- Skykomish Braided Reach Project
- Snohomish Floodplain Acquisition Strategy
- Barnaby Reach Restoration
- Deepwater Slough Restoration
- Steamboat Slough Mitigation Site
- Union Slough Mitigation
- North Ebey Island Restoration
- Snohomish Estuary Restoration Effects on Temperature, Salinity, and Tides
- Tulalip Landfill Cleanup
- Restoration For All
- Effects of Exposed Tidal Flats on Water Temperature in the Snohomish Estuary
- Whidbey Basin Estuary Restoration Monitoring
- Biocultural Restoration of Riverscape Forests and Wetlands With Agroforestry
One Effort in Admiralty Inlet
5 Efforts in Fraser Lowlands
- Lower Canyon Creek Restoration
- Farmhouse Reach Floodplain Restoration
- Nooksack Floodplain Restoration with Engineered Log Jams
- Evaluating Salmon Rearing Limitations in River Deltas
- Floodplain Permit Streamlining Workgroup for Nooksack
Restoration Products
The following Product pages are categorized with Restoration.
Documents
Abbe et al 2018 design and placement of engineered log jams • Aubry & Potash 2007 olympic native plant notebook • BLM 1999 sampling vegetation attributes • Baek et al 2015 mid-spencer 60% design • Baker et al 2016 estuary restoration lessons learned • Barber 2014 vegetation and sediment at port susan • Barnas et al 2015 pacific salmon restoration project targeting • Beamer 2016 fisher slough restoration effectiveness • Beamer et al 2003 importance of non-natal pocket estuaries • Beamer et al 2006 deepwater slough effectiveness • Beamer et al 2006 whidbey pocket estuary fish • Beamer et al 2013 chinook salmon non-natal stream rearing • Beamer et al 2013 fisher slough fish monitoring 2011 • Beamer et al 2013 fisher slough fish monitoring 2012 • Beamer et al 2018 fir island farms fish monitoring 2015-18 • Beechie et al 2010 process based restoration of rivers • Bentrup 2008 conservation buffer design guidelines • Biddle et al 2022 national strategy protect restore floodplain wetland function • Blackmore 2009 obstacles to salmon recovery projects • Bloch et al. 2019 coastal stream and embayment restoration prioritization • Boevers 2008 adaptive management large-scale restoration • Boyd 2013 fisher slough monitoring lessons • Boyd 2016 hat slough & fisher slough lessons learned • Brown 2015 DRAFT nooksack floodplain vision and implementation • CLAMP 2009 capitol lake steering committee recommendation • Carah et al 2014 low cost wood in streams • Cardno-entrix 2013 snow creek design report • Celedonia 2002 forest and scrub-shrub restoration benchmarks • Cereghino 2004 native cutting thesis • Cereghino 2009 introduction to vegetation monitoring • Cereghino 2009 revegetation nearshore • Cereghino 2015 accelerating estuary restoration • Cereghino 2019 summary of cutting bed installation seattle • Cereghino 2021 delta adaptive management draft (2010-13) • Cereghino 2022 edmonds marsh watershed desktop assessment • Cereghino 2023 Reiner stewardship plan • Cereghino et al 2022 beach nourishment science sprint • Clancy et al 2009 PSNERP nearshore management measures • Collins & Montgomery 2002 restoring wood in river floodplains • Cornu et al 2008 large wood placement in tidal wetlands • Crowder & Darris 1999 produce cuttings in beds • Darris 2006 suggestions for cutting installation • David et al 2014 chinook salmon foraging nisqually after restoration • Detheir et al 2020 snohomish railroad grade nourishment • Devine & Harrington 2010 planting garry oak • Diefenderfer et al 2007 multiple scale coastal restoration assessment • Drummond et al 2018 Poster edgewater bulkhead removal and boat lidar • Duda et al 2023 dam removal cost prediction • Dunwiddie et al. 2009 restoration resilience for climate change • EPA-USACE 2008 compensatory mitigation for losses of aquatic resources • ESA et al. 2022 coastal stream and embayment fish access framework • ESRP 2012 red salmon slough revegetation deliverables • Ecology 2015 riparian restoration and protection initiative grant guidelines • Ehinger et al 2015 DRAFT beach habitat value • Ehrenfeld & Toth 1997 restoration in ecosystem context • Flint 2012 woods creek riparian action plan • Fresh et al 2004 guidance restoration protection • Friebel 2016 fir island farms lessons learned • Fuller 2018 tnc port susan bay final monitoring report • Fuller et al 2014 port susan monitoring report • Gann et al 2019 SER restoration standards and practices • Giordanengo & Mandel 2016 willow and cottonwood installation • Goetz et al 2004 PSNERP restoration principles • Greiner 2010 principles strategic conservation • Griffith & Fuller 2012 stillaguamish delta restoration target DRAFT.pdf • Guthrie 2012 tidal fresh swamp revegetation • Habitat Strategic Initiative 2021 estuary and floodplain implementation strategy • Hall et al 2019 DRAFT snohomish monitoring plan • Hartema et al 2015 willow livestake diameter in reed canarygrass • Hartema et al 2018 willow pole diameter in reed canarygrass • Hass 2001 snohomish ecosystem restoration opportunities • Herrera 2007 canyon creek restoration plan • Hill 2002 keyline yeomans and whole farm design • Hood 2012 tidal channel reference model • Hood 2014 natural tidal channel model • Hood 2019 fir island farms monitoring yr3 • Hume & Bush 2020 final report riparian protection restoration • IEEP & Milieu 2013 multi-benefit green infrastructure • Johannessen & Waggoner 2008 lummi shore road monitoring • Knutson & Naef 1997 riparian management recommendations • Lacarella et al. 2024 salmon stream temperature under climate change • Latterell er al 2014 tolt river levee removal presentation.pdf • Leonetti et al 2015 north fork stillaguamish habitat change • Long et al 2011 snow-salmon estuary restoration monitoring report • MacDonald et al 2013 elwha nearshore workshop proceedings • McDonald et al 2016 SER international restoration standards • McHenry et al 2007 ELJ monitoring elwha river • Meidev & Neslon 2016 qwuloolt lessons learned • Moore et al 2003 vegetation monitoring manual • Multi-scale benefits of estuary restoration for PS Chinook salmon ESRP webinar Final.pdf • Murcia et al 2014 novel ecosystem critique • NOAA & USFWS 2013 PROJECTS programmatic restoration biological opinion • NOAA & USFWS 2015 PROJECTS programmatic restoration biological opinion • NOAA 2009 NWR restoration center programmatic biological opinion • NOAA NMFS 2011 fish passage design • NOSC 2009 salmon estuary monitoring plan • PGG 2012 leque island restoration camano island groundwater • PSRITT 2015 chinook monitoring adaptive management framework • PWA 2008 deschutes estuary restoration feasibility • Polster 2002 soil bioengineering techniques • Porrini 2018 fir island farms invertebrate monitoring • Porro et al 2022 Assessing Effects Of Estuarine Restoration On Birds ESRP presentation • Porro et al 2022 effects of estuarine restoration on bird populations in north Puget Sound • Roegner et al 2008 columbia river estuary restoration monitoring protocols • Roni et al 2013 DRAFT BPA columbia river restoration monitoring plan • Roni et al 2015 wood placement summary • Rubin 2019 how to run a plant-a-thon • SRFB 2019 large project barriers • STAG 2000 recommended chinook recovery in stillaguamish • Schlenger et al 2011 PSNERP strategic needs assessment • Schuster & Doerr 2015 guide for ecosystem service valuation in coastal restoration • Scott 2023 valley bottom reset monitoring Deer Creek Oregon • Shannon & Wilson Inc 2011 fir island farms feasibility study • Shreffler et al 2008 jimmycomelately lessons learned • Simenstad et al 2004 urban estuary restoration challenge • Skidmore & Wheaton 2022 riverscapes as adaptation infrastructure • Smart & Dick 1999 propagate establish wetland plants • SnoCo 2014 DRAFT lower skykomish reach scale plan • Snohomish County 2020 smith and mid-spencer monitoring year 0-1 • TNC 2012 port susan restoration as-built plans.pdf • TNC 2012 port susan stewardship plan.pdf • TNC 2014 port susan monitoring progress.pdf • TNC 2017 fisher slough restoration summary.pdf • Tanner et al 2002 south spencer restoration • Thurston CD 2004 WRIA 13 salmon recovery plan.pdf • Toft et al 2013 Habitat Enhancements • USACE 2000 stillaguamish restoration feasibility.pdf • USACE 2011 qwuloolt environmental assessment.pdf • USFWS & NOAA 2016 contractors handbook PROJECTS BMPs.pdf • USFWS 2010 endangered species agriculture tax deduction.pdf • WDFW 2015 delta restoration replacement lands.pdf • WDFW 2015 guidance using NMFS design.pdf • WDNR 2013 piling and creosote removal BMP.pdf • Ward 2005 social forestry shasta bioregion.pdf • Watershed Company 2021 WCC restoration methods evaluation.pdf • Weinerman et al 2012 fisher slough economic benefits.pdf • Woo et al 2011 port susan monitoring plan.pdf • Yang et al. 2010 hydrodynamic and ecological assessment of nearshore restoration • Zu Ermgassen et al 2016 oyster restoration objectives for ecosystem services.pdf
