Murcia et al 2014 novel ecosystem critique
From Salish Sea Wiki
- Last Ten Products
- Small, D., P. Smith, I. Keren, T. Quinn, P. Schlenger 2024 Fine scale movement of juvenile salmon to inform tidal fish passage restoration in Puget Sound
- Greene & Chamberlin 2024 multi-scale benefits of delta restoration for salmon
- Seedlot Selection Tool
- Bioregional Funding Facilities Funding Resources
- Cereghino 2024 draft riverscape agroforestry principles
- FEMA 2023 Flood Risk Mapping Guidance
- Cereghino 2024 Salish sea platform short intro
- Islands in the Salish Sea
- USDA Plants Database
- ESA 2024 bellingham culvert prioritization
- Product Categories
- Google scholar search
- Linked To This Product
- Wiki Rules
- Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
- Please adhere to our Social Contract and Style Guide
- Complain here, and be nice.
Murcia, C., Aronson, J., Kattan, G. H., Moreno-Mateos, D., Dixon, K., Simberloff, D. (2014) A critique of the 'novel ecosystem' concept. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 29(10), 548-553
Notes
- Journalistic review - http://news.mongabay.com/2014/1202-hong-novel-ecosystems.html#ixzz3MGg7DZ2A
- This article is part of a theoretical argument about landscape management goals. It doesn't seem to identify the natural-disturbed gradient, and the potential value of "novel ecosystems" that meet human needs while providing more ecosystem services than traditional annual agriculture which produces ecosystem scale disruption and impacts. Pcereghino (talk)
- This issue native restoration vs. synthetic ecosystem design is particularly relevant to Riparian Buffer Function in severely disturbed agricultural landscapes.
