Murcia et al 2014 novel ecosystem critique
From Salish Sea Wiki
- Last Ten Documents
- Blevins et al. 2024 freshwater mussel survey.pdf
- Murphy 2020 no one asked for ethnography
- NOAA 2022 mitigation policy.pdf
- Gaydos et al 2008 principles design healthy ecosystems
- Barnhardt & Kawagley 2005 indigenous knowledge systems alaska
- Ecology 1991 public trust doctrine and coastal zone
- WDOE 2024 climate guidance shoreline management
- Adopt-A-Stream Foundation 2024 wetland stream ecology training.pdf
- Imai 2012 continuous improvement strategy
- Waterman-Hoey 2022 washington greenhouse gas emissions inventory.pdf
- Product Categories
- Google scholar search
- Linked To This Product
- Wiki Rules
- Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
- Please adhere to our Social Contract and Style Guide
- Complain here, and be nice.
Murcia, C., Aronson, J., Kattan, G. H., Moreno-Mateos, D., Dixon, K., Simberloff, D. (2014) A critique of the 'novel ecosystem' concept. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 29(10), 548-553
Notes
- Journalistic review - http://news.mongabay.com/2014/1202-hong-novel-ecosystems.html#ixzz3MGg7DZ2A
- This article is part of a theoretical argument about landscape management goals. It doesn't seem to identify the natural-disturbed gradient, and the potential value of "novel ecosystems" that meet human needs while providing more ecosystem services than traditional annual agriculture which produces ecosystem scale disruption and impacts. Pcereghino (talk)
- This issue native restoration vs. synthetic ecosystem design is particularly relevant to Riparian Buffer Function in severely disturbed agricultural landscapes.