Murcia et al 2014 novel ecosystem critique
From Salish Sea Wiki
- Last Ten Documents
- Cereghino 2015 grant administrative streamlining
- WDNR 2001 shorezone data dictionary
- Thurston County 2015 county-wide planning policies
- TRPC 2013 sustainable thurston development plan
- TNC 2011 fisher slough monitoring baseline report
- TCAMRC 2018 thurston amphibian road survey summary
- TCAMRC 2017 thurston amphibian road survey protocols
- Sync 2018 infrastructure coordination fact sheet
- Sync 2018 DRAFT strategic plan for infrastructure coordination
- Stuart & Canty 2010 environmental markets for agriculture
- Product Categories
- Google scholar search
- Linked To This Product
- Wiki Rules
- Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
- Please adhere to our Social Contract and Style Guide
- Complain here, and be nice.
Murcia, C., Aronson, J., Kattan, G. H., Moreno-Mateos, D., Dixon, K., Simberloff, D. (2014) A critique of the 'novel ecosystem' concept. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 29(10), 548-553
Notes
- Journalistic review - http://news.mongabay.com/2014/1202-hong-novel-ecosystems.html#ixzz3MGg7DZ2A
- This article is part of a theoretical argument about landscape management goals. It doesn't seem to identify the natural-disturbed gradient, and the potential value of "novel ecosystems" that meet human needs while providing more ecosystem services than traditional annual agriculture which produces ecosystem scale disruption and impacts. Pcereghino (talk)
- This issue native restoration vs. synthetic ecosystem design is particularly relevant to Riparian Buffer Function in severely disturbed agricultural landscapes.
