Scott 2023 valley bottom reset monitoring Deer Creek Oregon

From Salish Sea Wiki


Product Icon.jpg

Product

A product is any output of an effort, including datasets, documents, graphics, or websites.


UploadDocumentButton.PNG

Last Ten Products
Product Categories
Dataset(1 P)
Document(2 C, 139 P, 506 F)
Graphic(2 C, 1 F)
Website(23 P)
Google scholar search
Linked To This Product
Wiki Rules


Link to List of Workgroups Link to List of Topics Link to List of Places

Link to List of Efforts Link to List of Products Link to List of Documents Link to List of Graphics Link to List of Websites

Link to Delta Sites Link to Embayment Sites Link to Beach Sites Link to Rocky Headland Sites

Link to Headwater Sites Link to Lowland Watershed Sites Link to Floodplain Sites

Scott, D. N. (2024). Widespread wood placement and regrading drive lateral connectivity and reworking of the channel and floodplain in a valley bottom reset to Stage 0. Geomorphology, 446, 108987.

credit:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169555X23004075?via%3Dihub

Notes[edit]

  • Documents restoration in the Deer Creek on the McKenzie River in the Willamette Basin. Project is near the "Finn Rock Project", which is in the mainstem McKenzie.
  • Project aims to increase lateral connectivity and retention of wood and sediment, and the vegetation and wood structures necessary to sustain the condition.
  • Deer Creek is very low flow system with 59km2 watershed, with common peaks over 10cms and 1/year 40cms, but base flow nearing zero (annoyingly little info on hydrology).
  • Valley bottom was regraded using a mean "geomorphic grade line" over 2.5 km of stream--gradient 2%, valley width, 60-150m
    • Phase 1 "Upstream/Downstream" 2016 - 200 logs/km and limited GGL flattening. Initial project, less intensive. Monitored
    • Phase 2 "Budwrom/Upstream" 2020- extensive GGL and 4x wood load. Monitored. enough wood that most logs were touching!
    • Phase 3 "Middle" and Phase 4 "Downstream" 2021-22 were not monitored.
  • How does floodplain wood placement in loose spatially distributed pattern, sometimes stabilized by entanglement or burial, then rearrange?
    • Phase 2 resulted in much larger scale floodplain change than experienced at Phase 1 during higher flow. Wood in Phase 2 reorganized into jams organized around existing veg or buried wood (not just key pieces as described by Abbe & Montgomery 2003.
    • Pool area measured as % of valley bottom increased from 6.6% to 8.2% and 3.2% to 4.1%
    • Evidence of floodplain alluvial work and deposition and very low river stage, and maintenance of off channel features.
    • Images suggest rapid recruitment of vegetation in floodplain/channel and increase in mosaic complexity (many small patches rather than large bars in meandering river bar system.)

Questions[edit]

  • Unknown whether multi-thread stream/wetland complex will sustain in the future, or if a large event will reestablish channel incision. No observation of substantive upstream recruitment.
  • Unknown whether a large flood event might result in mass mobilization of wood, or if a reinforcing feedback loop has established, where increased wood density has resulted in reduced wood mobility.
  • How does reestablishment of a river-wetland corridor affect invertebrate populations in the reach and fish gut content?