Roni et al 2015 wood placement summary
From Salish Sea Wiki
- Last Ten Documents
- Blevins et al. 2024 freshwater mussel survey.pdf
- Murphy 2020 no one asked for ethnography
- NOAA 2022 mitigation policy.pdf
- Gaydos et al 2008 principles design healthy ecosystems
- Barnhardt & Kawagley 2005 indigenous knowledge systems alaska
- Ecology 1991 public trust doctrine and coastal zone
- WDOE 2024 climate guidance shoreline management
- Adopt-A-Stream Foundation 2024 wetland stream ecology training.pdf
- Imai 2012 continuous improvement strategy
- Waterman-Hoey 2022 washington greenhouse gas emissions inventory.pdf
- Product Categories
- Google scholar search
- Linked To This Product
- Wiki Rules
- Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
- Please adhere to our Social Contract and Style Guide
- Complain here, and be nice.
Roni, P., Beechie, T., Pess, G. and Hanson, K., 2015. Wood placement in river restoration: fact, fiction, and future direction. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 72(3), pp.466-478.
Notes[edit]
- Describes the long history and extent of wood placement, including under the CCC during the depression of the 1930's.
- The focus of placement has been to create pools and protective cover, resulting in documented improvement to trout numbers in Eastern US streams.
- NW streams are higher energy, larger, steeper, and more dynamic. Concern over the failure rate of wood structures has led to construction of structures using whole trees to form jams to mimic natural accumulations of woody debris.
- Removal of wood has led the public to be accustomed to rivers without wood, and wood can cause damage to bridges and levees, and may present a recreational risk.
- Natural recruitment of wood varies based on stream order with debris flow in steep confined systems, tree fall in mid-order, and bank erosion in high-order systems (see Montgomery 1999 for process domain concept.)
- Natural loss of wood also varies by stream order, with slow decay in low orders, and transport to sea at higher orders.
- Resulting loading rates are highly variable and depend on vegetation and stream order, with higher levels of over 1000m3 per hectare in dense conifer forest.
- Wood results in sediment storage, increase retention of organic matter and nutrients, island formation, decreased grain size, sediment sorting, increased spawning area, increased pool number, area and depth, and can change overall channel morphology, increased side channel formation, reduced bank erosion, and increased spread and retention of floodwaters.
- Meta analysis of wood placement effectiveness indicates that asking the right questions is important for evaluating restoration through would placement.
- Wood naturally occurred in most stream channels, failure rates of placement are relatively low, particularly when viewed from a reach scale, and positive physical and biological responses are reported by most studies.
