Dunwiddie et al. 2009 restoration resilience for climate change
From Salish Sea Wiki
- Last Ten Documents
- Thurston County 2015 county-wide planning policies.pdf
- TRPC 2013 sustainable thurston development plan.pdf
- Girardet 2010 regenerative cities.pdf
- Brennan et al 2003 nearshore salmon central puget sound.pdf
- Blevins et al. 2024 freshwater mussel survey.pdf
- Lacarella et al. 2024 salmon stream temperature under climate change
- Murphy 2020 no one asked for ethnography
- AWC 2021 home rule in washington counties and cities.pdf
- NOAA 2022 mitigation policy.pdf
- Gaydos et al 2008 principles design healthy ecosystems
- Product Categories
- Google scholar search
- Linked To This Product
- Wiki Rules
- Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
- Please adhere to our Social Contract and Style Guide
- Complain here, and be nice.
Dunwiddie, P.W., S.A. Hall, M.W. Ingraham, J.D. Bakker, K.S. Nelson, R. Fuller, E. Gray. 2009. Rethinking Conservation Practice in Light of Climate Change. Ecological Restoration. 27:3. http://dx.doi.org/10.3368/er.27.3.320
Notes
- Identifies three general strategies for restoration in a climate change context, by increasing the systems ability to self organized under stress or disturbance, and thereby have functional resilience:
- Component Redundancy - restore more components that all provide the same functions.
- Functional Redundancy - introduce additional components that provide the same functions.
- Increased Connectivity - increase the spatial proximity and easy access to components.
- These strategies are oriented towards allow successful species reorganize in response to change, and be able to find the habitat functions that they need within the changing landscapes.
