Dunwiddie et al. 2009 restoration resilience for climate change
From Salish Sea Wiki
- Last Ten Products
- Small, D., P. Smith, I. Keren, T. Quinn, P. Schlenger 2024 Fine scale movement of juvenile salmon to inform tidal fish passage restoration in Puget Sound
- Greene & Chamberlin 2024 multi-scale benefits of delta restoration for salmon
- Seedlot Selection Tool
- Bioregional Funding Facilities Funding Resources
- Cereghino 2024 draft riverscape agroforestry principles
- FEMA 2023 Flood Risk Mapping Guidance
- Cereghino 2024 Salish sea platform short intro
- Islands in the Salish Sea
- USDA Plants Database
- ESA 2024 bellingham culvert prioritization
- Product Categories
- Google scholar search
- Linked To This Product
- Wiki Rules
- Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
- Please adhere to our Social Contract and Style Guide
- Complain here, and be nice.
Dunwiddie, P.W., S.A. Hall, M.W. Ingraham, J.D. Bakker, K.S. Nelson, R. Fuller, E. Gray. 2009. Rethinking Conservation Practice in Light of Climate Change. Ecological Restoration. 27:3. http://dx.doi.org/10.3368/er.27.3.320
Notes
- Identifies three general strategies for restoration in a climate change context, by increasing the systems ability to self organized under stress or disturbance, and thereby have functional resilience:
- Component Redundancy - restore more components that all provide the same functions.
- Functional Redundancy - introduce additional components that provide the same functions.
- Increased Connectivity - increase the spatial proximity and easy access to components.
- These strategies are oriented towards allow successful species reorganize in response to change, and be able to find the habitat functions that they need within the changing landscapes.