Rate of channel development

From Salish Sea Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search


Salish Sea References

Wiki Rules

  • Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
  • Please adhere to our social contract
  • Complain here, and be nice.


Link to List of Workgroups Link to List of Efforts Link to List of Resources Link to List of Documents Link to List of Topics Link to List of Places

Link to Headwater Sites Link to Lowland Watershed Sites Link to Floodplain Sites Link to Delta Sites Link to Embayment Sites Link to Beach Sites Link to Rocky Headland Sites

Predicting Rates of Channel Development

South Fork InfraRed.jpg

Tidal marsh restoration to recover threatened estuarine species, protect shorelines from storms and tsunamis, and provide other ecosystem services is incomplete without restoration of the tidal channels that link them to adjacent rivers, bays, and ocean, and provide habitat for estuarine fish and wildlife. A significant uncertainty associated with tidal marsh restoration is whether tidal channels should be actively excavated or passively allowed to erode through tidal flushing. Financial costs of active channel excavation need to be weighed against the opportunity cost to estuarine fish of slow, passive, tidal channel erosion. If channel network erosion is quick, then the passive approach is feasible. If channel network erosion is slow, then active excavation may be required to maximize ecological benefit to estuarine fish. GIS analysis of aerial photos of historical dike failure and marsh restoration sites was used to track channel network development through passive erosion over time. Channel network development rates were highly variable between sites, but scaled with site size. This positive scaling is likely the consequence of large marshes having disproportionately more channelized tidal prism and less over-marsh sheet flow, while small marshes have disproportionately more sheet flow. Depending on site size and the equilibrium geometry of reference marshes, the time required for restoration site channel networks to passively erode to full expression was estimated to require 6 to 60 years.

Documents and Presentations

Link to ESRP Learning Project Synopsis

Link to Final ESRP Webinar pdf

Notes

The final report for this project is currently being submitted for publication. For a copy of the draft manuscript, please contact esrp@dfw.wa.gov

Link to PRISM snapshot

SRSC.pngWDFW.pngNOAA.png