Urgenson et al 2009 giant knotweed implications

Product

A product is any output of an effort, including datasets, documents, graphics, or websites.

Last Ten Documents

• Blevins et al. 2024 freshwater mussel survey.pdf
• Murphy 2020 no one asked for ethnography
• NOAA 2022 mitigation policy.pdf
• Gaydos et al 2008 principles design healthy ecosystems
• Barnhardt & Kawagley 2005 indigenous knowledge systems alaska
• Ecology 1991 public trust doctrine and coastal zone
• WDOE 2024 climate guidance shoreline management
• Adopt-A-Stream Foundation 2024 wetland stream ecology training.pdf
• Imai 2012 continuous improvement strategy
• Waterman-Hoey 2022 washington greenhouse gas emissions inventory.pdf

Product Categories

Dataset‎ (1 P)

Document‎ (2 C, 139 P, 506 F)

Graphic‎ (2 C, 1 F)

Website‎ (23 P)

Google scholar search

Linked To This Product

Wiki Rules

• Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
• Please adhere to our Social Contract and Style Guide
• Complain here, and be nice.

Urgenson, L.S., Reichard, S.H. and Halpern, C.B., 2009. Community and ecosystem consequences of giant knotweed (Polygonum sachalinense) invasion into riparian forests of western Washington, USA. Biological Conservation, 142(7), pp.1536-1541.

• https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320709000998

Notes

• Knotweed excludes native ground vegetation
• Nitrogen recovery from stems to roots at the end of the growing season is extremely efficient (70%) compared to 5-33% in native vegetation.
• Knotweed litter has a higher C:N ratio of 50:1 compared to 30-40:1 among native trees, while fresh leaves have a high C:N ratio (~13:1)