Maudlin & Coe 2011 SF Nooksack ELJ effectiveness
From Salish Sea Wiki
- Last Ten Products
- Small, D., P. Smith, I. Keren, T. Quinn, P. Schlenger 2024 Fine scale movement of juvenile salmon to inform tidal fish passage restoration in Puget Sound
- Greene & Chamberlin 2024 multi-scale benefits of delta restoration for salmon
- Seedlot Selection Tool
- Bioregional Funding Facilities Funding Resources
- Cereghino 2024 draft riverscape agroforestry principles
- FEMA 2023 Flood Risk Mapping Guidance
- Cereghino 2024 Salish sea platform short intro
- Islands in the Salish Sea
- USDA Plants Database
- ESA 2024 bellingham culvert prioritization
- Product Categories
- Google scholar search
- Linked To This Product
- Wiki Rules
- Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
- Please adhere to our Social Contract and Style Guide
- Complain here, and be nice.
Maudlin, M., and T. Coe. 2011. Effectiveness monitoring of South Fork Nooksack Instream Habitat Projects, Summer 2011. July 11, 2012. Nooksack Tribe, Natural Resources Department. Deming, WA.
63 pages.
Notes
- This report describes observations of pool formation and woody cover effectiveness at over 80 ELJs constructed on the Nooksack South Fork. In general, reach scale geomorphic functions (channel splitting, side channel activation) were less effective than jam-scale functions (pool formation). ELJs were generally stable, and causing an increase in pool structure, particularly where ELJs intrude into the active channel. Different ELJs tended to provide either pool formation or woody cover functions, and most structures provided bank protection. Pcereghino 09:52, 11 September 2012 (PDT)
