Bland et al 2018 measuring risk of ecological collapse

Product

A product is any output of an effort, including datasets, documents, graphics, or websites.

Create A New Product Page

Last Ten Documents

• Cereghino 2015 grant administrative streamlining
• WDNR 2001 shorezone data dictionary
• Thurston County 2015 county-wide planning policies
• TRPC 2013 sustainable thurston development plan
• TNC 2011 fisher slough monitoring baseline report
• TCAMRC 2018 thurston amphibian road survey summary
• TCAMRC 2017 thurston amphibian road survey protocols
• Sync 2018 infrastructure coordination fact sheet
• Sync 2018 DRAFT strategic plan for infrastructure coordination
• Stuart & Canty 2010 environmental markets for agriculture

Product Categories

Dataset‎ (1 C, 6 P)

Document‎ (5 C, 158 P, 520 F)

Graphic‎ (3 C, 78 F)

Website‎ (35 P)

Google scholar search

Linked To This Product

Wiki Rules

• Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
• Please adhere to our Social Contract and Style Guide
• Complain here, and be nice.

Bland, L.M., Rowland, J.A., Regan, T.J., Keith, D.A., Murray, N.J., Lester, R.E., Linn, M., Rodríguez, J.P. and Nicholson, E., 2018. Developing a standardized definition of ecosystem collapse for risk assessment. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(1), pp.29-36.

Google Scholar Search

Notes

• Completed a global literature review examining studies of ecological collapse in temperate forest and pelagic ocean ecosystems. Study focused on how to evaluate risk of collapse, and on ecological functions rather than social costs.
• Defining the characteristics of the initial and collapsed ecosystem is critical for defining indicators, and distinguishing between variability and directional change in condition.
• Observation of collapse in smaller patches can suggest indicators of landscape-scale collapse (e.g. watersheds without salmon compared to watersheds with salmon? Pcereghino (talk))
• Many studies neglect the observation of how change in ecosystem processes lead to collapse. Understanding pathways to collapse is important for identifying intermediary states, and indicators.
• No studies used expert elicitation methods to define collapsed states.
• Collapse thresholds rarely use quantitative methods to establish when change in an indicator suggests a change in state.
• Indicators may be "spatial, biotic, or abiotic" and few studies used systematic criteria to score or compare indicators.
• In this context, loss of habitats that sustain biodiversity varies from system to system.
• What is the appropriate scale at which to observe and report on collapse?