Dethier et al 2016 impacts of armoring
From Salish Sea Wiki
- Last Ten Documents
- Blevins et al. 2024 freshwater mussel survey.pdf
- Murphy 2020 no one asked for ethnography
- NOAA 2022 mitigation policy.pdf
- Gaydos et al 2008 principles design healthy ecosystems
- Barnhardt & Kawagley 2005 indigenous knowledge systems alaska
- Ecology 1991 public trust doctrine and coastal zone
- WDOE 2024 climate guidance shoreline management
- Adopt-A-Stream Foundation 2024 wetland stream ecology training.pdf
- Imai 2012 continuous improvement strategy
- Waterman-Hoey 2022 washington greenhouse gas emissions inventory.pdf
- Product Categories
- Google scholar search
- Linked To This Product
- Wiki Rules
- Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
- Please adhere to our Social Contract and Style Guide
- Complain here, and be nice.
Megan N. Dethier, Wendel W. Raymond, Aundrea N. McBride, Jason D. Toft, Jeffery R. Cordell, Andrea S. Ogston, Sarah M. Heerhartz, Helen D. Berry, Multiscale impacts of armoring on Salish Sea shorelines: Evidence for cumulative and threshold effects, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, Volume 175, 20 June 2016, Pages 106-117, ISSN 0272-7714, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2016.03.033.
Notes[edit]
- Logs, wrack, and high-shore invertebrates decline with shoreline armoring.
- Armoring emplaced further down the beach face has progressively greater impacts.
- Documented threshold responses with elevation are relevant for habitat managers.
- In drift cells with extensive armoring, beaches have coarser sediment.
- Detection of geomorphic beach changes requires large spatial scales of observation.