Cox et al 2010 review ostroms design principles
From Salish Sea Wiki
- Last Ten Documents
- Blevins et al. 2024 freshwater mussel survey.pdf
- Murphy 2020 no one asked for ethnography
- NOAA 2022 mitigation policy.pdf
- Gaydos et al 2008 principles design healthy ecosystems
- Barnhardt & Kawagley 2005 indigenous knowledge systems alaska
- Ecology 1991 public trust doctrine and coastal zone
- WDOE 2024 climate guidance shoreline management
- Adopt-A-Stream Foundation 2024 wetland stream ecology training.pdf
- Imai 2012 continuous improvement strategy
- Waterman-Hoey 2022 washington greenhouse gas emissions inventory.pdf
- Product Categories
- Google scholar search
- Linked To This Product
- Wiki Rules
- Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
- Please adhere to our Social Contract and Style Guide
- Complain here, and be nice.
Cox, M., G. Arnold, and S. Villamayor Tomás. 2010. A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society 15(4): 38. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art38/
Notes
- Provides a literature review of projects that make observations compared to Ostrom's design principles for community-based common pool resources management.
- The summarize evidence supporting or refuting the principles, and summarize critiques of the principles, which include but are not limited to:
- principles point at structural attributes, but do not expose processes like trust, legitimacy, and transparency.
- generalization outside of a cultural context may lead to principles presented as a panacea to complex cultural challenges.
- discounting powerful local or contextual ecological or economic factors that overpower any controls created by application of the principles.
- that principles are commonly extended to situations outside the kinds of systems used to identify the principles.