Cox et al 2010 review ostroms design principles
From Salish Sea Wiki
- Last Ten Documents
- Cereghino 2015 grant administrative streamlining
- WDNR 2001 shorezone data dictionary
- Thurston County 2015 county-wide planning policies
- TRPC 2013 sustainable thurston development plan
- TNC 2011 fisher slough monitoring baseline report
- TCAMRC 2018 thurston amphibian road survey summary
- TCAMRC 2017 thurston amphibian road survey protocols
- Sync 2018 infrastructure coordination fact sheet
- Sync 2018 DRAFT strategic plan for infrastructure coordination
- Stuart & Canty 2010 environmental markets for agriculture
- Product Categories
- Google scholar search
- Linked To This Product
- Wiki Rules
- Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
- Please adhere to our Social Contract and Style Guide
- Complain here, and be nice.
Cox, M., G. Arnold, and S. Villamayor Tomás. 2010. A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society 15(4): 38. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art38/
Notes
- Provides a literature review of projects that make observations compared to Ostrom's design principles for community-based common pool resources management.
- The summarize evidence supporting or refuting the principles, and summarize critiques of the principles, which include but are not limited to:
- principles point at structural attributes, but do not expose processes like trust, legitimacy, and transparency.
- generalization outside of a cultural context may lead to principles presented as a panacea to complex cultural challenges.
- discounting powerful local or contextual ecological or economic factors that overpower any controls created by application of the principles.
- that principles are commonly extended to situations outside the kinds of systems used to identify the principles.
