Stillaguamish Delta: Difference between revisions

From Salish Sea Wiki
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
*The Stillaguamish River is currently not dammed, and so the sediment budget has not been reduced by dam impoundment.  However [[Czuba et al 2011]] suggests that the Stillaguamish sediment budget is relatively low compared to other [[Whidbey Basin]] systems.   
*The Stillaguamish River is currently not dammed, and so the sediment budget has not been reduced by dam impoundment.  However [[Czuba et al 2011]] suggests that the Stillaguamish sediment budget is relatively low compared to other [[Whidbey Basin]] systems.   
*The [[Oso Landslide]] in March of 2014 was a gigantic slump in a deep seated landslide site on the [[North Fork Stillaguamish Floodplain]], and increased sediment loading by 50 or 60% for several years, after a large initial pulse.  Much of the Oso material has largely moved through the system, due to the high proportion of fines in the slide material resulting is a large proportion of suspended load (Grossman, pers coms).
*The [[Oso Landslide]] in March of 2014 was a gigantic slump in a deep seated landslide site on the [[North Fork Stillaguamish Floodplain]], and increased sediment loading by 50 or 60% for several years, after a large initial pulse.  Much of the Oso material has largely moved through the system, due to the high proportion of fines in the slide material resulting is a large proportion of suspended load (Grossman, pers coms).
*Flow is divided between Hat Slough and the Old Stillaguamish Channel.  Flow switched from Old Stilly Channel to Hat Slough in the 1990s and increased in 2006 flood (Citation?).
*Flow is divided between Hat Slough and the Old Stillaguamish Channel.  Flow has been switching from the Old Stilly Channel to Hat Slough over time (citation?).
*The [[Stillaguamish Flood Control District]] manages (all? some?) dikes and levees in the delta.
*The [[Stillaguamish Flood Control District]] manages (all? some?) dikes and levees in the delta.
*Twin Foods, a major land owner on Florence Island anticipates selling its processing plant in Stanwood [http://www.heraldnet.com/business/twin-city-foods-to-close-stanwood-plant-85-jobs-affected/].
*Twin Foods, a major land owner on Florence Island anticipates selling its processing plant in Stanwood [http://www.heraldnet.com/business/twin-city-foods-to-close-stanwood-plant-85-jobs-affected/].
*[[WDFW]] is planning to construct a public boat launch in Stanwood along the Old Channel.  The [[City of Stanwood]] has recently purchased the old Ovenell Farm for the purpose of developing a multipurpose public waterfront including docks[http://www.ci.stanwood.wa.us/parksrec/page/ovenell-farm-park].


[[File:Stillaguamish delta restoration sites.jpg|right|400px|map of current conditions c. 2012]]
[[File:Stillaguamish delta restoration sites.jpg|right|400px|map of current conditions c. 2012]]
==Related Efforts==
 
*[[Griffith & Fuller 2012]] proposes a estuarine restoration target to supplement the recovery plan ([[SIRC 2005]])
==Related Reports and Analysis==
*[[Snohomish Sustainable Lands Strategy]] has been hosting discussion of how redevelopment of the delta can support both fishery restoration and farm viability, with the [[Matterand Restoration]] and [[Leque Island Restoration]].
*[[Griffith & Fuller 2012]] proposes a large estuarine restoration target to supplement the Stillaguamish Basin Salmon Recovery Plan ([[SIRC 2005]])
*Fuller completed a brief exploration of [[Stillaguamish Delta Dredged Sediment Re-use]] to build marsh.   
*[[Snohomish Sustainable Lands Strategy]] has been hosting discussion of how redevelopment of the delta can support both fishery restoration and farm viability.
*Fuller completed a brief exploration of [[Stillaguamish Delta Dredged Sediment Re-use]] to build marsh in response to marsh erosion.   
*[[The Nature Conservancy]] has completed a dike setback project called the [[Port Susan Restoration]] which incorporated flood gates to benefit Florence Island residents and farmers.
*[[The Nature Conservancy]] has completed a dike setback project called the [[Port Susan Restoration]] which incorporated flood gates to benefit Florence Island residents and farmers.
*[[Leque Island Restoration]] resulted in concern from some Camano Island residents about how the project might affect their sole source aquifir.
*[[Leque Island Restoration]] resulted in concern from some Camano Island residents about how the project might affect their sole source aquifir, resolved through a USGS study of groundwater that suggests that the aquifir will not be affected.  WDFW is continuing groundwater monitoring during project implementation.
*Restoration planning in the system generates concern from farming communities about the loss of farmland.
*Restoration planning in the system generates concern from farming communities about the loss of farmland.
*[[Stillaguamish Delta Dredged Sediment Re-use]] - Snohomish county is exploring the feasibility of how dredge materials could be reused to support marsh formation in the Stillaguamish Delta.  [[Port Susan Restoration]] is most subsided


==Restoration==
==Restoration==
*In 2012 the [[Port Susan Restoration]] was completed by [[The Nature Conservancy]], initiating restoration of the delta. [[File:Fuller et al 2014 port susan monitoring report.pdf]] summarizes findings of monitoring.
*In 2012 the [[Port Susan Restoration]] was completed by [[The Nature Conservancy]], initiating restoration of the delta. [[File:Fuller et al 2014 port susan monitoring report.pdf]] summarizes findings of monitoring. The site is subsided and so the number of connections to surrounding distributaries is less than would be found in a natural system.
*Marsh continues to erode in portion of the delta not receiving river flow.  At current rates fringing marsh along North Florence Island would be gone in 15 years.
*Water from the Stillaguamish River mainstem is still predominantly to the south.
*The natural river levee along the [[Port Susan Restoration]] is too high to allow strong freshwater flow into the subsided restoration site.  Increasing connection of river flow and sediments north of the current river mouth has been proposed.
*The natural river levee along the [[Port Susan Restoration]] is too high to allow strong freshwater flow into the subsided restoration site.  Increasing connection of river flow and sediments north of the current river mouth has been proposed.
*[[Zis a Ba Restoration]] developed by the [[Stillaguamish Indian Tribe]] restores 80 acres of Florence Island to tidal flows in 2017.
*[[WDFW]] completed internal work on [[Leque Island Restoration]] in 2017 and anticipated restoration of tidal flooding in 2019 pending state budget resolution.
*There is an opportunity to improve connectivity at the North Leque Island site, also managed for the state by WDFW.
==System Dynamics and Questions==
*Marsh continues to erode in portions of the delta not receiving river flow.  At current rates fringing marsh along North Florence Island would be gone in 15 years (cite).
*Water from the Stillaguamish River mainstem flows predominantly to the south, with wave resuspension the primary mechanisms for sediment movement to the north.
*Along the northern delta, high marsh is accreting but marsh area is still eroding.  The origin of high marsh sediment inputs is unclear.  One theory is that wave action combined with snow goose herbivory is eroding low marsh and re-suspending sediments.  The relative influence of sediment starvation, wave energy, and goose effects are unclear.
*Along the northern delta, high marsh is accreting but marsh area is still eroding.  The origin of high marsh sediment inputs is unclear.  One theory is that wave action combined with snow goose herbivory is eroding low marsh and re-suspending sediments.  The relative influence of sediment starvation, wave energy, and goose effects are unclear.
*Primary production in tidal marsh is affected by pore water salinity.  The interaction between topography, sediment texture, river water, and groundwater dynamics (including reduction of groundwater head due to subsidence of historical delta landward), and how these will change under climate change is poorly understood.  Years of low river flow, and accompanying increases in low-flow salinity can change marsh vegetation episodically.  Vegetation provides wave attenuation.
*Primary production in tidal marsh is affected by pore water salinity.  The interaction between topography, sediment texture, river water, and groundwater dynamics (including reduction of groundwater head due to subsidence of historical delta landward), and how these will change under climate change is poorly understood.  Years of low river flow, and accompanying increases in low-flow salinity can change marsh vegetation episodically.  Vegetation provides wave attenuation.
*Ongoing work at [[Leque Island Restoration]] and [[Zis a Ba Restoration]]
*It may be important to clarify restoration expectations for the role of restoration in affecting freshwater and bed-load and suspended sediment conveyance into the system, and our strategy relative to subsided areas within the delta that are anomylous potential sediment sinks in the tidal plain.
*What are our expectations for the role of restoration in affecting freshwater conveyance into the system, and what is our strategy relative to subsided areas within the delta that are not typical
*[[Snohomish Agricultural Resilience]] work is trying to consider the combination of groundwater mounding, increased river level due to both bed aggredation and increased hydrograph.  Proposed groundwater analysis will evaluate groundwater work for both the Stillaguamish and Snohomish. Quantification of sea level rise risk through groundwater mounding is important for considering questions about how to protect local agricultural production under greenhouse impacts.
*[[Snohomish Agricultural Resilience]] work is trying to consider the combination of groundwater mounding, increased river level due to both bed aggredation and increased hydrograph.  Proposed groundwater analysis will evaluate groundwater work for both the Stillaguamish and Snohomish.
*It seems likely that the re-routing of the Stillaguamish River mouth at TNC may not be significant enough to cause system scale effects, however breaching the TNC site to increase river flow into the restoration site may be a viable approach.
*This raises questions about how to manage agricultural land during the complex transition.
*There is an important role for building community understanding of alternatives and risks in the delta as part of the restoration planning processCommunities living below sea level may have not had the time to absorb and process the implications of sea level rise [[User:Pcereghino|Pcereghino]] ([[User talk:Pcereghino|talk]]).
*It seems likely that the re-routing of the Stillaguamish River mouth at TNC may not be significant enough to cause system scale effects, however breaching the TNC site to increase river flow into the restoration site.
*Modelling can fail to resolve social dynamics, because communities can observe detailed system dynamics that are not necessarily observed by simple models.  To accurately model delta environments requires an expensive integration of multiple change models.  An incremental parallel approach to community development and model development may be useful [[User:Pcereghino|Pcereghino]] ([[User talk:Pcereghino|talk]]).
*There is an important role for building community understanding of alternatives and risks.  Modelling can fail to resolve social dynamics, because communities understand the dynamics of the system that are not resolved by monitoring.


{{DPU STL}}
{{DPU STL}}

Revision as of 17:25, 19 October 2017


Most Recent Edits

<DPL> namespace = foo category = river delta ordermethod = lastedit order = descending mode = unordered suppresserrors = true count = 5 </dynamicpagelist>

Wiki Rules


Link to List of Workgroups Link to List of Topics Link to List of Places

Link to List of Efforts Link to List of Products Link to List of Documents Link to List of Graphics Link to List of Websites

Link to Delta Sites Link to Embayment Sites Link to Beach Sites Link to Rocky Headland Sites

Link to Headwater Sites Link to Lowland Watershed Sites Link to Floodplain Sites

Stillaguamish oblique summary.jpg

The Stillaguamish River Delta has formed where the Stillaguamish River enters Port Susan, a natural bay formed between the lowland glacial terrace, and Camano Island. The town of Stanwood is partially constructed in the historic delta. Collins & Sheik 2005 consider the Stillaguamish wetlands as part of a contiguous Skagit-Stillaguamish complex.

Context

  • The Stillaguamish Delta is the cornerstone of the Port Susan Bay Ecosystem, and is sometimes geomorphically grouped with the Skagit Delta (Collins & Sheik 2005) as a contiguous tidal floodplain system with two rivers. In the farming community, the delta is frequently considered part of the [[Lower Stillaguamish Floodplain. The delta extent described in Simenstad et al 2011 based on River History Project T-Sheets does not extend as far upstream as tidal inundation would currently reach, based on modern Digital Elevation Models reviewed by the Delta Metrics Project.
  • Florence Island and a large area of farmlands behind river levees are below tidal flood elevation, and have subsided significantly since development. Current rates of subsidence are unknown.
  • The Stillaguamish River is currently not dammed, and so the sediment budget has not been reduced by dam impoundment. However Czuba et al 2011 suggests that the Stillaguamish sediment budget is relatively low compared to other Whidbey Basin systems.
  • The Oso Landslide in March of 2014 was a gigantic slump in a deep seated landslide site on the North Fork Stillaguamish Floodplain, and increased sediment loading by 50 or 60% for several years, after a large initial pulse. Much of the Oso material has largely moved through the system, due to the high proportion of fines in the slide material resulting is a large proportion of suspended load (Grossman, pers coms).
  • Flow is divided between Hat Slough and the Old Stillaguamish Channel. Flow has been switching from the Old Stilly Channel to Hat Slough over time (citation?).
  • The Stillaguamish Flood Control District manages (all? some?) dikes and levees in the delta.
  • Twin Foods, a major land owner on Florence Island anticipates selling its processing plant in Stanwood [1].
  • WDFW is planning to construct a public boat launch in Stanwood along the Old Channel. The City of Stanwood has recently purchased the old Ovenell Farm for the purpose of developing a multipurpose public waterfront including docks[2].
map of current conditions c. 2012

Related Reports and Analysis

  • Griffith & Fuller 2012 proposes a large estuarine restoration target to supplement the Stillaguamish Basin Salmon Recovery Plan (SIRC 2005)
  • Snohomish Sustainable Lands Strategy has been hosting discussion of how redevelopment of the delta can support both fishery restoration and farm viability.
  • Fuller completed a brief exploration of Stillaguamish Delta Dredged Sediment Re-use to build marsh in response to marsh erosion.
  • The Nature Conservancy has completed a dike setback project called the Port Susan Restoration which incorporated flood gates to benefit Florence Island residents and farmers.
  • Leque Island Restoration resulted in concern from some Camano Island residents about how the project might affect their sole source aquifir, resolved through a USGS study of groundwater that suggests that the aquifir will not be affected. WDFW is continuing groundwater monitoring during project implementation.
  • Restoration planning in the system generates concern from farming communities about the loss of farmland.

Restoration

System Dynamics and Questions

  • Marsh continues to erode in portions of the delta not receiving river flow. At current rates fringing marsh along North Florence Island would be gone in 15 years (cite).
  • Water from the Stillaguamish River mainstem flows predominantly to the south, with wave resuspension the primary mechanisms for sediment movement to the north.
  • Along the northern delta, high marsh is accreting but marsh area is still eroding. The origin of high marsh sediment inputs is unclear. One theory is that wave action combined with snow goose herbivory is eroding low marsh and re-suspending sediments. The relative influence of sediment starvation, wave energy, and goose effects are unclear.
  • Primary production in tidal marsh is affected by pore water salinity. The interaction between topography, sediment texture, river water, and groundwater dynamics (including reduction of groundwater head due to subsidence of historical delta landward), and how these will change under climate change is poorly understood. Years of low river flow, and accompanying increases in low-flow salinity can change marsh vegetation episodically. Vegetation provides wave attenuation.
  • It may be important to clarify restoration expectations for the role of restoration in affecting freshwater and bed-load and suspended sediment conveyance into the system, and our strategy relative to subsided areas within the delta that are anomylous potential sediment sinks in the tidal plain.
  • Snohomish Agricultural Resilience work is trying to consider the combination of groundwater mounding, increased river level due to both bed aggredation and increased hydrograph. Proposed groundwater analysis will evaluate groundwater work for both the Stillaguamish and Snohomish. Quantification of sea level rise risk through groundwater mounding is important for considering questions about how to protect local agricultural production under greenhouse impacts.
  • It seems likely that the re-routing of the Stillaguamish River mouth at TNC may not be significant enough to cause system scale effects, however breaching the TNC site to increase river flow into the restoration site may be a viable approach.
  • There is an important role for building community understanding of alternatives and risks in the delta as part of the restoration planning process. Communities living below sea level may have not had the time to absorb and process the implications of sea level rise Pcereghino (talk).
  • Modelling can fail to resolve social dynamics, because communities can observe detailed system dynamics that are not necessarily observed by simple models. To accurately model delta environments requires an expensive integration of multiple change models. An incremental parallel approach to community development and model development may be useful Pcereghino (talk).

Nearshore Strategies Data Report

Cereghino et al 2012 completed a soundwide analysis to identify and describe river delta sites in Puget Sounds as part of a nearshore ecosystem restoration strategy (using remote sensing data c. 2000-2006). The following narrative of this delta site was developed to support distribution and use of analysis results:

The Stillaguamish Delta in the Whidbey Sub-basin historically contained 7,249 acres of vegetated wetland along a 65 km shoreline. The delta receives flow from a 180,570 square kilometer watershed. These characteristics make this system the 3th largest delta out of 16 systems in Puget Sound.
Simenstad et al 2011 found that this system had lost 69% of its vegetated tidal wetlands, and 22% of its shoreline length. Of the remaining shoreline, 87% shows some evidence of infrastructure development. In the surrounding uplands, 40% of land is estimated to have greater than 10% impervious surface. Across the watershed, 22% of land is estimated to have greater than 10% impervious surface. Based on these paramters, the site was given a degradation score of 40 out of 100, making it the 7th most degraded delta in Puget Sound. It faces a medium risk of future development locally, and a medium risk of development across the watershed. None of the watershed is currently impounded behind dams.


Wiki Pages in the "Stillaguamish" and "River Delta"

Pages


Documents


Images