File:Brennan et al 2003 nearshore salmon central puget sound.pdf

Product

A product is any output of an effort, including datasets, documents, graphics, or websites.

Last Ten Documents

• Thurston County 2015 county-wide planning policies.pdf
• TRPC 2013 sustainable thurston development plan.pdf
• Girardet 2010 regenerative cities.pdf
• Blevins et al. 2024 freshwater mussel survey.pdf
• Lacarella et al. 2024 salmon stream temperature under climate change
• Murphy 2020 no one asked for ethnography
• AWC 2021 home rule in washington counties and cities.pdf
• NOAA 2022 mitigation policy.pdf
• Gaydos et al 2008 principles design healthy ecosystems

Product Categories

Dataset‎ (1 P)

Document‎ (2 C, 139 P, 506 F)

Graphic‎ (2 C, 1 F)

Website‎ (23 P)

Google scholar search

Linked To This Product

Wiki Rules

• Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
• Please adhere to our Social Contract and Style Guide
• Complain here, and be nice.

Brennan, J.S., K.F. Higgins, J.R. Cordell, and V.A. Stamatiou. 2004. Juvenile salmon composition, timing, distribution, and diet, in marine nearshore waters of central Puget Sound in 2001-2002. King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks, Seattle, WA. 164 pp.

Notes

• Wild and hatchery fish likely compete for the same resources.
• 22 hatcheries among 13 watersheds were present in catch, and the presence of north sound fish indicates that early marine migration is not oriented towards the ocean.
• Chinook salmon were present over the entire sampling period (May-October in 2001 and April to December 2002). They were most abundant in June. Chinook were the most broadly distributed and there was no significant difference in abundance between island sites with no natal rivers and mainland sites with natal rivers, suggesting dispersal over open water.
• Pink Salmon were most abundant in April and absent by May.
• Chum Salmon were most abundant in April and May, and dropped off dramatically by June.
• Chinook diet shifted with increasing size, with benthic and epibenthic prey dominant at less than 9cm FL, planktonic and neritic components dominant for fish greater than 15 cm FL. Terrestrial insects were equally important within the intermediate size class.
• By contrast Coho diet was dominated by planktonic prey.