Dunwiddie et al. 2009 restoration resilience for climate change

Document

A document is a written record related to an effort or topic

Last Ten Documents

• Adopt-A-Stream Foundation 2024 wetland stream ecology training.pdf
• Imai 2012 continuous improvement strategy
• Waterman-Hoey 2022 washington greenhouse gas emissions inventory.pdf
• Beamer et al 2006 whidbey pocket estuary fish
• Scott 2023 valley bottom reset monitoring Deer Creek Oregon
• Cluer and Thorne 2014 stream evolution model
• Thesis-Dissertation
• WDNR 2001 shorezone data dictionary.pdf
• Wearne et al. 2023 contemporary bioregionalism
• Synthesis

• Google scholar search

Wiki Rules

• Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
• Please adhere to our Social Contract and Style Guide
• Complain here, and be nice.

---

Dunwiddie, P.W., S.A. Hall, M.W. Ingraham, J.D. Bakker, K.S. Nelson, R. Fuller, E. Gray. 2009. Rethinking Conservation Practice in Light of Climate Change. Ecological Restoration. 27:3. http://dx.doi.org/10.3368/er.27.3.320

• UW Posted
• Google Scholar Search

Notes

• Identifies three general strategies for restoration in a climate change context, by increasing the systems ability to self organized under stress or disturbance, and thereby have functional resilience:
  1. Component Redundancy - restore more components that all provide the same functions.
  2. Functional Redundancy - introduce additional components that provide the same functions.
  3. Increased Connectivity - increase the spatial proximity and easy access to components.
• These strategies are oriented towards allow successful species reorganize in response to change, and be able to find the habitat functions that they need within the changing landscapes.