File:Port Angeles 2014 shoreline restoration plan.pdf
From Salish Sea Wiki
Port_Angeles_2014_shoreline_restoration_plan.pdf (file size: 1.14 MB, MIME type: application/pdf)
- Last Ten Documents
- WDNR 2001 shorezone data dictionary
- Thurston County 2015 county-wide planning policies
- TRPC 2013 sustainable thurston development plan
- TNC 2011 fisher slough monitoring baseline report
- TCAMRC 2018 thurston amphibian road survey summary
- TCAMRC 2017 thurston amphibian road survey protocols
- Sync 2018 infrastructure coordination fact sheet
- Sync 2018 DRAFT strategic plan for infrastructure coordination
- Stuart & Canty 2010 environmental markets for agriculture
- Stick et al 2014 herring stock status 2012
- Product Categories
- Google scholar search
- Linked To This Product
- Wiki Rules
- Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
- Please adhere to our Social Contract and Style Guide
- Complain here, and be nice.
Notes
- p15-17 Includes 10 "Goals" that repeat general statutory objectives but sets not measurable or spatially explicit objectives.
- Table 3 offers potential metrics.
- On page 18 the plan mentions developing zoning to protect, but not to support restoration.
- It establishes a goal to "encourage shoreline restoration and enhancement" but provides only abstract targets and no mechanisms.
- It mentions a shoreline salmonid analysis by Pentac Environmental (2001) that used a Tidal Habitat Model to score shorelines for juvenile habitat. This analysis identified:
- Lagoon connectivity, debris removal and revegetation.
- Creek mouth reconstruction and restoration.
- p21 indicates that the City Stormwater Management Plan includes GIS data. There is currently a stormwater pollution prevention mapper which presents stormwater network data
- A substantial portion of the potential projects are derived from other reports, particularly the Port Angeles Shoreline Inventory, Characterization, and Analysis Report. The following notes were derived from the project list:
- WDNR has completed debris removal in the past.
- Creek mouth restoration at Tumwater Creek has been given a high ranking. There are greater opportunities for daylighting.
- The only quantification proposed is to evaluate projects that come in, rather than evaluating progress towards a desired future condition.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|
current | 23:18, 4 December 2018 | (1.14 MB) | Pcereghino (talk | contribs) | {{document}}category:planningcategory:juan de fuca |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage
The following page uses this file: