Conservation Project Budget Standards: Difference between revisions
Pcereghino (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Pcereghino (talk | contribs) m (→Documents) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*[[file:Cereghino 2018 DRAFT budget issue analysis.docx]] - analysis of problem is issues | *[[file:Cereghino 2018 DRAFT budget issue analysis.docx]] - analysis of problem is issues | ||
*[[file:Cereghino 2018 DRAFT budget structure concept.xlsx]] - analysis of cost classification among grant programs (driven by ESRP and Salmon) | *[[file:Cereghino 2018 DRAFT budget structure concept.xlsx]] - analysis of cost classification among grant programs (driven by ESRP and Salmon) | ||
*[[File:Large project budget coordination A3.docx]] - original A3 used in [[Coordinated Investment]] process | *[[File:Large project budget coordination A3.docx]] - original A3 used in [[Coordinated Investment]] process | ||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
Revision as of 16:29, 11 December 2019
- Salish Sea References
- Ecology Shoreline Photography Viewer
- The Encyclopedia of Puget Sound provides a peer reviewed version of the wiki
- PRISM Project Search
- Washington Coastal Atlas
- UW River History Project
- Wiki Rules
- Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
- Please adhere to our Social Contract and Style Guide
- Complain here, and be nice.
This effort was identified as part of Snohomish County focus work under Coordinated Investment and by the Water and Salmon Grant Program Coordination to increase the transparency and efficiency of large project budget development and revision. The aim is to have a single budget structure with definitions for project status and deliverables that can be shared among multiple grant programs. This allows a project manager to develop and maintain a single budget that can be used to apply for and manage multiple grants over a project life-cycle. This effort is focused on large multi-phase floodplain projects, or reach scale riparian zone projects, which typically depend on mixing multiple awards over multiple phases, such that a standard budget format would be useful.
Documents
- File:RCO & ECY 2019 DRAFT interagency agreement budget standards.pdf - add task to SPSSEG to include development of budget standards
- File:NOAA & SPSSEG 2018 DRAFT budget integration scope of work.docx - task breakdown and cost estimate with SPSSEG
- File:Cereghino 2018 DRAFT budget issue analysis.docx - analysis of problem is issues
- File:Cereghino 2018 DRAFT budget structure concept.xlsx - analysis of cost classification among grant programs (driven by ESRP and Salmon)
- File:Large project budget coordination A3.docx - original A3 used in Coordinated Investment process
Notes
- File:Cereghino 2015 grant administrative streamlining.docx describes an analysis of how to move toward a single regional application which includes identification of common language and budget structure.
- Water and Salmon Grant Program Coordination workgroup agreed that working with a Snohomish team would support this effort
