File:SAEDAT 2007 snohomish agricultural development strategy.pdf

Product

A product is any output of an effort, including datasets, documents, graphics, or websites.

Last Ten Documents

• NOAA 2022 mitigation policy.pdf
• Gaydos et al 2008 principles design healthy ecosystems
• Barnhardt & Kawagley 2005 indigenous knowledge systems alaska
• Ecology 1991 public trust doctrine and coastal zone
• WDOE 2024 climate guidance shoreline management
• Adopt-A-Stream Foundation 2024 wetland stream ecology training.pdf
• Imai 2012 continuous improvement strategy
• Waterman-Hoey 2022 washington greenhouse gas emissions inventory.pdf
• Beamer et al 2006 whidbey pocket estuary fish
• Scott 2023 valley bottom reset monitoring Deer Creek Oregon

Product Categories

Dataset‎ (1 P)

Document‎ (2 C, 139 P, 506 F)

Graphic‎ (2 C, 1 F)

Website‎ (23 P)

Google scholar search

Linked To This Product

Wiki Rules

• Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
• Please adhere to our Social Contract and Style Guide
• Complain here, and be nice.

Snohomish County Agricultural Economic Development Action Team. 2007. Report to county executive. 34 pp.

Notes

• Describes results of SAEDAT committe work.
• Makes recommendations for preserving the agricultural land base, building on the Snohomish Agriculture Action Plan.
  • Suggests expansion of PDR and TDR programs in combination with dedicated county revenue for acquisition of development rights.
  • Suggests reducing regulatory redundancy, focusing on activities rather than critical areas, to stabilize regulation to encourage long-term investment--and references Chapter 30.62A Part 600 Agricultural Activities (See Snohomish County Code
  • Suggests increased farmer education including development of an Agricultural Ombudsman
  • Proposes a 4-6:1 mitigation requirement for habitat restoration.
  • Suggests directing PDR/TDR acquisitions for 95% agricultural benefit.
  • Suggests allowing compatible use in habitat areas (NTFP, selective harvest, rotational grazing).
  • Proposes reducing regulatory complexity around farm infrastructure investments.
• Infrastructure Strategy 3 proposes development of a 100 year vision for agriculture
• Describes the need for proactive flood control planning between SWM and Valley flood districts, and proposes a set of interlocal agreements to coordinate SWM and Districts in flood and drainage management.