Stillaguamish Delta: Difference between revisions

From Salish Sea Wiki
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
{{DPU STL}}
{{DPU STL}}


==Current Condition and Risks==
==Context==
*The Stillaguamish River is currently not dammed, and so the sediment budget has not been reduced by dam impoundmentHowever [[Czuba et al 2011]] suggests that the Stillaguamish sediment budget is relatively low compared to other [[Whidbey Basin]] systems.
*The Stillaguamish Delta is the cornerstone of the [[Port Susan Bay Ecosystem]], and is sometimes geomorphically grouped with the [[Skagit Delta]] ([[Collins & Sheik 2005]])In the farming community, the delta is frequently considered part of the [[[[Lower Stillaguamish Floodplain]]. The delta extent described in [[Simenstad et al 2011]] based on [[River History Project]] T-Sheets does not extend as far upstream as tidal inundation would currently reach, based on Digital Elevation Models used by the [[Delta Metrics Project]].
*Flow is divided between Hat Slough and the Old Stillaguamish Channel. Flow switched from Old Stilly Channel to Hat Slough  in the 1990s and increased in 2006 flood (Citation?)
*Florence Island and a large area of farmlands behind river levees are below tidal flood elevation, and have subsided significantly since development.  Current rates of subsidence are unknown.
*Florence Island and a large area of farmlands behind river levees are below tidal flood elevation, and have subsided significantly since development.  Current rates of subsidence are unknown.
*Aerial photo observations indicate that marsh along the face of Florence island is eroding where marsh is not receiving sediment-laden river water.
*The Stillaguamish River is currently not dammed, and so the sediment budget has not been reduced by dam impoundment.  However [[Czuba et al 2011]] suggests that the Stillaguamish sediment budget is relatively low compared to other [[Whidbey Basin]] systems. 
*The Oso Landslide in March of 2014, in a deep seated landslide site on the [[North Fork Stillaguamish Floodplain]] increased sediment loading by 50 or 60% for several years, after a large initial pulse.  Much of the Oso material has largely moved through they system, due to the high proportion of fine material in the slide material (Grossman).
*Flow is divided between Hat Slough and the Old Stillaguamish Channel.  Flow switched from Old Stilly Channel to Hat Slough  in the 1990s and increased in 2006 flood (Citation?).
*The [[Stillaguamish Flood Control District]] manages (all?  some?) dikes and levees in the delta.
*The [[Stillaguamish Flood Control District]] manages (all?  some?) dikes and levees in the delta.
*Along the northern delta, high marsh is accreting but low marsh is eroding along the north.  One theory is that wave action combined with snow goose herbivory is eroding low marsh and resuspending sediments.  The relative influence of sediment starvation, wave energy, and goose effects are unknown.
*The delta extent described in [[Simenstad et al 2011]] based on [[River History Project]] T-Sheets does not extend as far upstream as tidal inundation would currently reach, based on Digital Elevation Models used by the [[Delta Metrics Project]].
*the delta is the cornerstone of the [[Port Susan Bay Ecosystem]]
*The delta is frequently considered part of the [[[[Lower Stillaguamish Floodplain]]. 


==Notes==
==Related Efforts==
*In 2012 Hatt Slough restoration is complete
*Roger Fuller completed a report for TNC summarizing findings of monitoring.
*Marsh continues to erode in less active portion of the delta.  At current rates fringing marsh will be gone in 15 years.
*Water from the mainstem is still predominantly moving out and to the south, and is not bringing accretion to the fringing marsh.
*The natural river berm is too high to allow freshwater flow into the site.  Increasing connection of river flow and sediments north of the current river mouth.
*Monitoring suggests that there is accretion in the high marsh zone in areas that are eroding, but the origin of this.
*Biomass production is suppressed in some areas due to pore water salinity.  The interaction between topography, sediment texture, river water, and groundwater dynamics (including reduction of groundwater head due to subsidence of historical delta landward), and how these will change under climate change is poorly understood.
 
===Restoration Planning===
*[[Griffith & Fuller 2012]] proposes a estuarine restoration target to supllement the recovery plan ([[SIRC 2005]])
*[[Griffith & Fuller 2012]] proposes a estuarine restoration target to supllement the recovery plan ([[SIRC 2005]])
*[[Snohomish Sustainable Lands Strategy]] has been hosting discussion of how redevelopment of the delta can support both fishery restoration and farm viability, with a focus on the [[Matterand Restoration]] and [[Leque Island Restoration]], and an exploration of [[Stillaguamish Delta Dredged Sediment Re-use]] to build marsh.   
*[[Snohomish Sustainable Lands Strategy]] has been hosting discussion of how redevelopment of the delta can support both fishery restoration and farm viability, with a focus on the [[Matterand Restoration]] and [[Leque Island Restoration]], and an exploration of [[Stillaguamish Delta Dredged Sediment Re-use]] to build marsh.   
Line 35: Line 23:
*[[Stillaguamish Delta Dredged Sediment Re-use]] - Snohomish county is exploring the feasibility of how dredge materials could be reused to support marsh formation in the Stillaguamish Delta.  [[Port Susan Restoration]] is most subsided
*[[Stillaguamish Delta Dredged Sediment Re-use]] - Snohomish county is exploring the feasibility of how dredge materials could be reused to support marsh formation in the Stillaguamish Delta.  [[Port Susan Restoration]] is most subsided


==Related Wiki Resources==
==Restoration==
*In 2012 the [[Port Susan Restoration]] was completed by [[The Nature Conservancy]], initiating restoration of the delta. [[File:Fuller et al 2014 port susan monitoring report.pdf]] summarizes findings of monitoring.
*Marsh continues to erode in less active portion of the delta.  At current rates fringing marsh would be gone in 15 years.
*Water from the mainstem is still predominantly moving out and to the south, and is not bringing accretion to the fringing marsh.
*The natural river levee along the [[Port Susan Restoration]] is too high to allow freshwater flow into the subsided restoration site.  Increasing connection of river flow and sediments north of the current river mouth has been proposed.
*Along the northern delta, high marsh is accreting but low marsh is eroding along the north.  One theory is that wave action combined with snow goose herbivory is eroding low marsh and re-suspending sediments.  The relative influence of sediment starvation, wave energy, and goose effects are unknown.
*Monitoring suggests that there is accretion in the high marsh zone in areas that are eroding, but the origin of this.
*Biomass production is suppressed in some areas due to pore water salinity.  The interaction between topography, sediment texture, river water, and groundwater dynamics (including reduction of groundwater head due to subsidence of historical delta landward), and how these will change under climate change is poorly understood.  Years of low river flow, and accompanying increases in low-flow salinity can change marsh vegetation episodically.
*Ongoing work at [[Leque Island Restoration]] and [[Zis a Ba Restoration]]
*What are our expectations for the role of restoration in affecting freshwater conveyance into the system, and what is our strategy relative to subsided areas within the delta that are not typical
*[[Snohomish Agricultural Resilience]] work is trying to consider the combination of groundwater mounding, increased river level due to both bed aggredation and increased hydrograph.  Proposed groundwater analysis will evaluate groundwater work for both the Stillaguamish and Snohomish.
*This raises questions about how to manage agricultural land during the complex transition.
*It seems likely that the re-routing of the Stillaguamish River mouth at TNC may not be significant enough to cause system scale effects, however breaching the TNC site to increase river flow into the restoration site.
*There is an important role for building community understanding of alternatives and risks.  Modelling can fail to resolve social dynamics, because communities understand the dynamics of the system that are not resolved by monitoring.
 
==Wiki Pages in the "Stillaguamish" and "River Delta"==
{|
{|
|style="width:50%;vertical-align:top; padding-right:40px;"|
|style="width:50%;vertical-align:top; padding-right:40px;"|

Revision as of 18:56, 18 October 2017


Most Recent Edits
Wiki Rules


Link to List of Workgroups Link to List of Topics Link to List of Places

Link to List of Efforts Link to List of Products Link to List of Documents Link to List of Graphics Link to List of Websites

Link to Delta Sites Link to Embayment Sites Link to Beach Sites Link to Rocky Headland Sites

Link to Headwater Sites Link to Lowland Watershed Sites Link to Floodplain Sites

map of current conditions c. 2012

The Stillaguamish River Delta has formed where the Stillaguamish River enters Port Susan, a natural bay formed between the lowland glacial terrace, and Camano Island. The town of Stanwood is partially constructed in the historic delta. Collins & Sheik 2005 consider the Stillaguamish wetlands as part of a contiguous Skagit-Stillaguamish complex.

Nearshore Strategies Data Report

Cereghino et al 2012 completed a soundwide analysis to identify and describe river delta sites in Puget Sounds as part of a nearshore ecosystem restoration strategy (using remote sensing data c. 2000-2006). The following narrative of this delta site was developed to support distribution and use of analysis results:

The Stillaguamish Delta in the Whidbey Sub-basin historically contained 7,249 acres of vegetated wetland along a 65 km shoreline. The delta receives flow from a 180,570 square kilometer watershed. These characteristics make this system the 3th largest delta out of 16 systems in Puget Sound.
Simenstad et al 2011 found that this system had lost 69% of its vegetated tidal wetlands, and 22% of its shoreline length. Of the remaining shoreline, 87% shows some evidence of infrastructure development. In the surrounding uplands, 40% of land is estimated to have greater than 10% impervious surface. Across the watershed, 22% of land is estimated to have greater than 10% impervious surface. Based on these paramters, the site was given a degradation score of 40 out of 100, making it the 7th most degraded delta in Puget Sound. It faces a medium risk of future development locally, and a medium risk of development across the watershed. None of the watershed is currently impounded behind dams.


Context

  • The Stillaguamish Delta is the cornerstone of the Port Susan Bay Ecosystem, and is sometimes geomorphically grouped with the Skagit Delta (Collins & Sheik 2005). In the farming community, the delta is frequently considered part of the [[Lower Stillaguamish Floodplain. The delta extent described in Simenstad et al 2011 based on River History Project T-Sheets does not extend as far upstream as tidal inundation would currently reach, based on Digital Elevation Models used by the Delta Metrics Project.
  • Florence Island and a large area of farmlands behind river levees are below tidal flood elevation, and have subsided significantly since development. Current rates of subsidence are unknown.
  • The Stillaguamish River is currently not dammed, and so the sediment budget has not been reduced by dam impoundment. However Czuba et al 2011 suggests that the Stillaguamish sediment budget is relatively low compared to other Whidbey Basin systems.
  • The Oso Landslide in March of 2014, in a deep seated landslide site on the North Fork Stillaguamish Floodplain increased sediment loading by 50 or 60% for several years, after a large initial pulse. Much of the Oso material has largely moved through they system, due to the high proportion of fine material in the slide material (Grossman).
  • Flow is divided between Hat Slough and the Old Stillaguamish Channel. Flow switched from Old Stilly Channel to Hat Slough in the 1990s and increased in 2006 flood (Citation?).
  • The Stillaguamish Flood Control District manages (all? some?) dikes and levees in the delta.

Related Efforts

Restoration

  • In 2012 the Port Susan Restoration was completed by The Nature Conservancy, initiating restoration of the delta. File:Fuller et al 2014 port susan monitoring report.pdf summarizes findings of monitoring.
  • Marsh continues to erode in less active portion of the delta. At current rates fringing marsh would be gone in 15 years.
  • Water from the mainstem is still predominantly moving out and to the south, and is not bringing accretion to the fringing marsh.
  • The natural river levee along the Port Susan Restoration is too high to allow freshwater flow into the subsided restoration site. Increasing connection of river flow and sediments north of the current river mouth has been proposed.
  • Along the northern delta, high marsh is accreting but low marsh is eroding along the north. One theory is that wave action combined with snow goose herbivory is eroding low marsh and re-suspending sediments. The relative influence of sediment starvation, wave energy, and goose effects are unknown.
  • Monitoring suggests that there is accretion in the high marsh zone in areas that are eroding, but the origin of this.
  • Biomass production is suppressed in some areas due to pore water salinity. The interaction between topography, sediment texture, river water, and groundwater dynamics (including reduction of groundwater head due to subsidence of historical delta landward), and how these will change under climate change is poorly understood. Years of low river flow, and accompanying increases in low-flow salinity can change marsh vegetation episodically.
  • Ongoing work at Leque Island Restoration and Zis a Ba Restoration
  • What are our expectations for the role of restoration in affecting freshwater conveyance into the system, and what is our strategy relative to subsided areas within the delta that are not typical
  • Snohomish Agricultural Resilience work is trying to consider the combination of groundwater mounding, increased river level due to both bed aggredation and increased hydrograph. Proposed groundwater analysis will evaluate groundwater work for both the Stillaguamish and Snohomish.
  • This raises questions about how to manage agricultural land during the complex transition.
  • It seems likely that the re-routing of the Stillaguamish River mouth at TNC may not be significant enough to cause system scale effects, however breaching the TNC site to increase river flow into the restoration site.
  • There is an important role for building community understanding of alternatives and risks. Modelling can fail to resolve social dynamics, because communities understand the dynamics of the system that are not resolved by monitoring.

Wiki Pages in the "Stillaguamish" and "River Delta"

Pages


Documents


Images