River Delta Restoration: Difference between revisions

From Salish Sea Wiki
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


===Early Activity===
===Early Activity===
*Spencer Island
Initial restoration efforts were opportunistic
*Deepwater Slough
*[[Spencer Island Restoration]] in 1994 was among the first large scale restoration actions in Puget Sound, documented in [[Tanner et al 2002]].  In the same period of time, acquisition of large parcels by Snohomish County in the lower delta set the stage for latter work.  Other small dike breaches in the Snohomish were funded by mitigation at [[Marysville Mitigation Site]] and [[Spencer Island Mitigation Site]]
*Snohomish Mitigation Projects
*[[Deepwater Slough Restoration]] on [[WDFW]] land in the [[Skagit Delta]] was the first restoration in the [[Skagit Delta]] resulting in a mixed use site crossed by dikes as a compromise between restoration and duck hunting interests.
*Nisqually Tribe projects
*Restoration planning by the [[Skagit River System Cooperative]], culminating in [[Greene & Beamer 2005]] identified an empirical basis for estuary restoration as a crucial part of Skagit salmon recovery and led to long term support for Skagit Estuary monitoring under the [[Intensively Monitored Watersheds]] effortThis body of work from SRSC set the tone for future work in estuaries across Puget Sound.
*[[Skagit Delta]] and the was largely based on the work of the [[Skagit River System Cooperative]], culminating in [[Greene & Beamer 2005]] which identified a, empirical basis for estuary restoration as a crucial part of Skagit salmon recovery.  The body of work from SRSC set the tone for future work.
*The [[Nisqually Tribe]] led projects in [[Red Salmon Slough]] in the [[Nisqually Delta]] began with a mitigation action and a small dike removal.


===The First Wave of Delta Restoration:  Quilcene, Skokomish and Nisqually===
===Urban Delta Restoration===
*[[Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem Restoration Project]] was a large scale planning project which ran from 2001-2015 with the authorization of a feasibility report by congress.  It provided a sequence of analysis which described the relevance and loss of large river delta wetlands in Puget Sound, and established "process-based restoration" as a regional goal.  
*Restoration of the [[Puyallup Delta]] and [[Duwamish Delta]] was driven by [[Natural Resource Damage Assessment]] efforts, following superfund listing, and began restoration of pocket habitats in our two industrialized river deltas
*[[Estuary and Salmon Restoration Program]]
 
===The First Wave of Broad-scale Delta Restoration:  Quilcene, Skokomish and Nisqually===
*[[Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem Restoration Project]] was a large scale planning project which ran from 2001 until 2015 with the authorization of a feasibility report by the US Congress.  It provided a sequence of analysis which described the relevance and loss of large river delta wetlands in Puget Sound, and established "process-based restoration" as a regional goal.  
*The [[Estuary and Salmon Restoration Program]] was first authorized in the 2006 state capital budget, in response to work by PSNERP, and created a large state resource that could strategically provide multi-million dollar awards to support delta restoration.  This funding source began supporting the evaluation of delta restoration effectiveness, and was critical to Nisqually, Skokomish and following efforts.
*Meanwhile [[Quilcene Delta]] restoration was quietly advancing by the [[Hood Canal Salmon Enhancement Group]] under a series of projects.  While smaller and less researched than Nisqually or Skokomish, the Quilcene restoration was part of a leading edge of large scale dike setbacks.
*Meanwhile [[Quilcene Delta]] restoration was quietly advancing by the [[Hood Canal Salmon Enhancement Group]] under a series of projects.  While smaller and less researched than Nisqually or Skokomish, the Quilcene restoration was part of a leading edge of large scale dike setbacks.
*Skokomish Restoration 2005-2017
*Skokomish Restoration 2005-2017
Line 26: Line 29:
*Stillaguamish
*Stillaguamish


===Restoration of the Lower Snohomish Delta===
*


===The Challenge of Massive Scale Estuary Restoration:  Whidbey Basin===
===The Challenge of Massive Scale Estuary Restoration:  Whidbey Basin===

Revision as of 17:47, 18 August 2017


Wiki Rules


Link to List of Workgroups Link to List of Topics Link to List of Places

Link to List of Efforts Link to List of Products Link to List of Documents Link to List of Graphics Link to List of Websites

Link to Delta Sites Link to Embayment Sites Link to Beach Sites Link to Rocky Headland Sites

Link to Headwater Sites Link to Lowland Watershed Sites Link to Floodplain Sites

This page is a synthesis page to organize information about the Restoration of Puget Sound River Deltas. There are individual pages to orient to each river delta site. This page instead is intended to describe the shifting regional body of work groups, documents, and efforts that represent the incremental restoration of the larger River Delta sites. The focus is on local partnership, and evolution of funding systems. State and federal funding has strongly supported projects, with joint funding from multiple programs the norm.

Early Activity

Initial restoration efforts were opportunistic

Urban Delta Restoration

The First Wave of Broad-scale Delta Restoration: Quilcene, Skokomish and Nisqually

  • Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem Restoration Project was a large scale planning project which ran from 2001 until 2015 with the authorization of a feasibility report by the US Congress. It provided a sequence of analysis which described the relevance and loss of large river delta wetlands in Puget Sound, and established "process-based restoration" as a regional goal.
  • The Estuary and Salmon Restoration Program was first authorized in the 2006 state capital budget, in response to work by PSNERP, and created a large state resource that could strategically provide multi-million dollar awards to support delta restoration. This funding source began supporting the evaluation of delta restoration effectiveness, and was critical to Nisqually, Skokomish and following efforts.
  • Meanwhile Quilcene Delta restoration was quietly advancing by the Hood Canal Salmon Enhancement Group under a series of projects. While smaller and less researched than Nisqually or Skokomish, the Quilcene restoration was part of a leading edge of large scale dike setbacks.
  • Skokomish Restoration 2005-2017
  • Nisqually Delta restoration remains the single largest restoration action in Puget Sound, and was significant because it was a $15-20M project, funded by federal stimulus spending during the economic collapse of 2008-09 (along with the Elwha dam removals). It was the first "large scale" project, and inspired development of

Shifting Tools and Tactics

  • Inspired in part by the Nisqually Refuge Restoration the Puget Sound Acquisition and Restoration large capital projects program, which brought large blocks of state capital funding to bear on river delta projects, reinforcing ESRP as a funder of substantive estuary projects. Before ESRP and PSAR, only federal USACE Continuing Authority Programs provided these levels of funding.
  • Wiley Slough Restoration in the Skagit Delta restored flooding, but local farmers claimed that modification of drainage systems caused damages to crops. A culvert failed due to design and construction problems, and shoaling in the delta obstructed drainage pathways. This ongoing conflict refocused attention on the tensions between the operations of agriculture, restoration of tidal flooding, and the cultural divides between fish and farm communities.
  • The Skagit Tidegate Fish Initiative was a pivotal regulatory agreement negotiated by NOAA and several parties around trade offs between continued operation of tidegates and recovery of delta rearing Chinook salmon. NOAA agreed to not pursue a claim of "adverse modification of critical habitat under ESA as long as recovery projects continued to be advanced in the system. A credit trading system was developed to track the agreement.
  • Skagit Drainage and Fish Initiative, not unlike Skagit TFI, the DFI followed a regulatory conflict over maintenance of drainage ditches with fish access. A shared set of specifications and best management practices have
  • Estuary Vital Sign was adopted by the Puget Sound Partnership Leadership Council in ##
  • Cereghino 2015 is a report that attempts to assess
  • Fisher Slough Restoration was a relatively expensive project per acre, but pioneered multiple benefit work, by upgrading agricultural drainage systems, providing flood control benefits, and working closely with the local farming community.
  • Stillaguamish

Restoration of the Lower Snohomish Delta

The Challenge of Massive Scale Estuary Restoration: Whidbey Basin

Whidbey Basin Deltas account for 60% of historical vegetated tidal wetlands (Simenstad et al 2011). These systems also form the foundations of remaining Puget Sound Agricultural Production, as well as the core populations of Puget Sound salmonids, including two species listed under the Endangered Species Act.