Lower Skykomish Floodplain: Difference between revisions
Pcereghino (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Pcereghino (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
*[[NHC 2006]] describes flood risk as part of FEMA assessment. | *[[NHC 2006]] describes flood risk as part of FEMA assessment. | ||
*[http://waterdata.usgs.gov/usa/nwis/uv?12134500 USGS Gauge near Gold Bar] - continuous flood level readings. | *[http://waterdata.usgs.gov/usa/nwis/uv?12134500 USGS Gauge near Gold Bar] - continuous flood level readings. | ||
==Reach Scale Planning== | |||
Snohomish County has been developing reach scale plan methods with Skykomish as a pilot. | |||
*[[https://snohomishcountywa.gov/3808/42545/Reach-Scale-Plans]] - reach scale plan with Lower Skykomish Pilot | |||
==Notes of Activities== | ==Notes of Activities== |
Revision as of 18:48, 19 October 2017
- Salish Sea References
- Ecology Shoreline Photography Viewer
- The Encyclopedia of Puget Sound provides a peer reviewed version of the wiki
- PRISM Project Search
- Washington Coastal Atlas
- UW River History Project
- Wiki Rules
- Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
- Please adhere to our Social Contract and Style Guide
- Complain here, and be nice.
The Lower Skykomish Floodplain extends from the confluence with the Sultan River at the City of Sultan, downstream to the confluence with the Snoqualmie in the vicinity of the City of Monroe. Major tributaries to this reach include the Sultan River Watershed from the north at Sultan, the Elwell Creek Watershed from the south, and the Woods Creek Watershed from the north at Monroe. Downstream of Haskell Slough the basin is known as Tualco Valley.
(From SBSRF 2005)
From Sultan to Monroe, sediment supply and deposition balance out, and the channel becomes naturally more stable. It continues to support substantial Chinook salmon spawning and rearing [compared to the braided reach upstream], but is squeezed by a high amount of bank armoring that isolates the mainstem from off-channel habitats and prevents channel migration. As in much of the basin, current large woody debris loading and riparian conditions are a small fraction of their historic levels. Downstream of Monroe, sediment deposition increases and channel stability decreases [approaching the confluence], but conditions, land uses, and restoration opportunities are similar.
(From NHC 2006)
Flood problems in the lower Skykomish River are concentrated in the Tualco Valley area south of Monroe. The highest concentrations of development in the City of Monroe are generally on high ground above flood levels. Skykomish floodwaters do, however, back up Woods Creek and also inundate the Cadman gravel pit, both within the Monroe city limits.
The principal infrastructure affected by flooding includes SR-203, which stretches south from Monroe across the Skykomish River and through the lowermost portion of the Snoqualmie Valley, and the Burlington Northern - Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad, which parallels the river and is near the main channel at several points where it must be protected from bank erosion. Haskell Slough, a major floodplain overflow path, is blocked at its head by the Haskell Slough dike, a Snohomish County maintained structure. This dike, and the lands adjacent, has sustained significant damages in past floods and the river has exhibited behaviors indicating a possibility of avulsion though the slough.
In the lower end of the Tualco Valley, the flows of the Snoqualmie and Skykomish Rivers merge. Flood flows here are slower, but depths of flooding are greater and durations are longer. Throughout the lower Skykomish Valley localized bank erosion is common, putting structures near the channel at risk.
Notes on Conditions[edit]
- SBSRF 2005 suggests that Skykomish Chinook are at 3.4% of historic equilibrium population. The lower Skykomish Floodplain has among the highest current levels of Chinook use in the Skykomish system.
- WDFW completes Chinook spawner surveys to estimate escapement with data provided at theSCoRE. Additional information is avaialable about Snohomish system stocks
- DeVries 2010 provides a geomorphic assessment of the Lower Skykomish floodplain
- NHC 2006 describes flood risk as part of FEMA assessment.
- USGS Gauge near Gold Bar - continuous flood level readings.
Reach Scale Planning[edit]
Snohomish County has been developing reach scale plan methods with Skykomish as a pilot.
- [[1]] - reach scale plan with Lower Skykomish Pilot
Notes of Activities[edit]
- Expansion of the Cadman, Inc. mining operation prompted development of People for the Preservation of Tualco Valley which
- This is an assessment reach in the Snohomish Sustainable Lands Strategy
- Aerial View in Habitat Work Schedule
- Snohomish County is actively pursuing restoration opportunities in this reach, with the following projects in PRISM
- Stewardship Partners has supported development of the Lower Skykomish River Habitat Conservation Group which has been working to develop an agricultural land and natural resource conservation strategy for the Tualco Valley.
- The Qualco Biodigester was constructed by Qualco Energy Corporation to turn cow manure into energy and biomass, as a shared venture between the Tulalip Tribes, the Sno/Sky Agricultural Alliance, and Northwest Chinook Recovery.
- The Haskell Slough Restoration project was an early action on the Reiner Farm that resulted in increased flows to the slough, reforestation, and use of flood fencing to reduce avulsion risk and coarse sediment deposition on floodplain farm land.
- Skykomish Habitat Mitigation Bank is a private wetland bank developed in 2006 with USACE and WDOE.
- Garland & Liszak 1995 describes the High Rock Aquifir Break, where a gravel mining operation broke through a perched aquifer, causing a decline in 13 wells and three natural springs that had historically provided irrigation water, dairy water, and streamflow for the Tualco Valley.
- No coho spawners have been observed in the Riley Slough/Foye Creek system since 1994.
- There is a large beaver dams complex at the mouth of Riley Slough that should have coho rearing, but where coho rearing has been conpicuously absent (Haring 2002).
- The Haskell Slough Levee may limit flushing flows into Riley Slough (Haring 2002).