High Resolution Aerial Imagery Change Detection: Difference between revisions

From Salish Sea Wiki
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{effort}}[[Category:development]] [[category:plants and soils]]  
{{effort}}[[Category:development]] [[category:plants and soils]] [[category:vegetation]]
[[file:high resolution change detection.jpg|500px]]
[[file:high resolution change detection.jpg|500px]]



Revision as of 16:27, 22 February 2019


Wiki Rules


Link to List of Workgroups Link to List of Topics Link to List of Places

Link to List of Efforts Link to List of Products Link to List of Documents Link to List of Graphics Link to List of Websites

Link to Delta Sites Link to Embayment Sites Link to Beach Sites Link to Rocky Headland Sites

Link to Headwater Sites Link to Lowland Watershed Sites Link to Floodplain Sites

High resolution change detection.jpg

In 2006, the first set of statewide 1-m, aerial imagery was made available by the National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP). In 2009 a second set was acquired, providing the potential to analyze land-cover change at high resolutions statewide. However, statewide 1-m imagery is very large and difficult to work with over big areas. With this possibility in mind, the Salmon Recovery Funding Board (SRFB) provided an initial grant to scientists in the Habitat Program at WDFW to assess the feasibility of using high resolution aerial imagery for land-cover change mapping. Due to the many difficulties inherent in working with high-resolution data (discussed in detail in the methods and techniques), WDFW researchers focused their analysis on change related to mapping urbanization and forestry events. Funding from the SRFB was predicated on the idea of tracking riparian and shoreline conditions, to whatever extent feasible. Many issues with riparian corridors and shoreline vegetation have location specific boundaries on the order of 50-200 ft from a stream or waterbody. In order to accurately map conditions in these areas, spatial accuracy was considered the highest priority when compared with metrics such as species composition or stand characteristics.

Notes

WDFW.pngEPA.pngWDOE.pngPSP.pngRCO.png