Dunwiddie et al. 2009 restoration resilience for climate change: Difference between revisions
From Salish Sea Wiki
Roger Fuller (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{document}}Category:Stillaguamishcategory:hydrodynamicsCategory:Delta hydrodynamics and channelscategory:restoration Dunwiddie, P.W., S.A. Hall, M.W. Ingraha...") |
Pcereghino (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{document}}[[Category:Stillaguamish]][[category:hydrodynamics]][[Category:Delta hydrodynamics and channels]][[category:restoration]] | {{document}}[[Category:Stillaguamish]][[category:hydrodynamics]][[Category:Delta hydrodynamics and channels]][[category:restoration]][[category:climate change]] | ||
Dunwiddie, P.W., S.A. Hall, M.W. Ingraham, J.D. Bakker, K.S. Nelson, R. Fuller, E. Gray. 2009. Rethinking Conservation Practice in Light of Climate Change. Ecological Restoration. 27:3. | '''Dunwiddie, P.W., S.A. Hall, M.W. Ingraham, J.D. Bakker, K.S. Nelson, R. Fuller, E. Gray. 2009. Rethinking Conservation Practice in Light of Climate Change. Ecological Restoration. 27:3. | ||
http://dx.doi.org/10.3368/er.27.3.320 | http://dx.doi.org/10.3368/er.27.3.320''' | ||
*[http://er.uwpress.org/content/27/3/320.full.pdf?casa_token=9PF-aIHMXOAAAAAA:7YWyXhUrkni8LM4BsNASKISbmPthqAHUEhhqaKQiBpV94om4Majqsg550aFO-SZvjbpXWTlAy8c UW Posted] | |||
*[https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C48&q=Rethinking+Conservation+Practice+in+Light+of+Climate+Change.+Ecological+Restoration.&btnG= Google Scholar Search] | |||
==Notes== | |||
*Identifies three general strategies for restoration in a climate change context, by increasing the systems ability to self organized under stress or disturbance, and thereby have functional resilience: | |||
*#Component Redundancy - restore more components that all provide the same functions. | |||
*#Functional Redundancy - introduce additional components that provide the same functions. | |||
*#Increased Connectivity - increase the spatial proximity and easy access to components. | |||
*These strategies are oriented towards allow successful species reorganize in response to change, and be able to find the habitat functions that they need within the changing landscapes. |
Revision as of 17:56, 12 August 2021
- Last Ten Documents
- Adopt-A-Stream Foundation 2024 wetland stream ecology training.pdf
- Imai 2012 continuous improvement strategy
- Waterman-Hoey 2022 washington greenhouse gas emissions inventory.pdf
- Beamer et al 2006 whidbey pocket estuary fish
- Scott 2023 valley bottom reset monitoring Deer Creek Oregon
- Cluer and Thorne 2014 stream evolution model
- Thesis-Dissertation
- WDNR 2001 shorezone data dictionary.pdf
- Wearne et al. 2023 contemporary bioregionalism
- Synthesis
- Wiki Rules
- Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
- Please adhere to our Social Contract and Style Guide
- Complain here, and be nice.
Dunwiddie, P.W., S.A. Hall, M.W. Ingraham, J.D. Bakker, K.S. Nelson, R. Fuller, E. Gray. 2009. Rethinking Conservation Practice in Light of Climate Change. Ecological Restoration. 27:3. http://dx.doi.org/10.3368/er.27.3.320
Notes
- Identifies three general strategies for restoration in a climate change context, by increasing the systems ability to self organized under stress or disturbance, and thereby have functional resilience:
- Component Redundancy - restore more components that all provide the same functions.
- Functional Redundancy - introduce additional components that provide the same functions.
- Increased Connectivity - increase the spatial proximity and easy access to components.
- These strategies are oriented towards allow successful species reorganize in response to change, and be able to find the habitat functions that they need within the changing landscapes.