Dungeness Delta: Difference between revisions

From Salish Sea Wiki
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=REDIRECT{{:category:Dungeness Delta}}
{{deltasite}}
{{DPU DUN}}
==Notes==
*[[Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe]] has been completing restoraiton projects.
*[[Three Crabs Restoration]] is being implemented by [[North Olympic Salmon Coalition]].

Latest revision as of 20:55, 17 September 2014


Most Recent Edits
Wiki Rules
  • Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
  • Please adhere to our social contract
  • Complain here, and be nice.


Link to List of Workgroups Link to List of Topics Link to List of Places

Link to List of Efforts Link to List of Products Link to List of Documents Link to List of Graphics Link to List of Websites

Link to Headwater Sites Link to Lowland Watershed Sites Link to Floodplain Sites Link to Delta Sites Link to Embayment Sites Link to Beach Sites Link to Rocky Headland Sites

Nearshore Strategies Data Report

Cereghino et al 2012 completed a soundwide analysis to identify and describe river delta sites in Puget Sounds as part of a nearshore ecosystem restoration strategy (using remote sensing data c. 2000-2006). The following narrative of this delta site was developed to support distribution and use of analysis results:

The Dungeness Delta in the Juan de Fuca Sub-basin historically contained 297 acres of vegetated wetland along a 12 km shoreline. The delta receives flow from a 54,761 square kilometer watershed. These characteristics make this system the 10th largest delta out of 16 systems in Puget Sound.
Simenstad et al 2011 found that this system had lost 30% of its vegetated tidal wetlands, and 51% of its shoreline length. Of the remaining shoreline, 44% shows some evidence of infrastructure development. In the surrounding uplands, 20% of land is estimated to have greater than 10% impervious surface. Across the watershed, 24% of land is estimated to have greater than 10% impervious surface. Based on these paramters, the site was given a degradation score of 37 out of 100, making it the 9th most degraded delta in Puget Sound. It faces a low risk of future development locally, and a low risk of development across the watershed. None of the watershed is currently impounded behind dams.

Notes