Distributary configuration effects on delta sediment deposition: Difference between revisions

From Salish Sea Wiki
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{topic}}{{ESRPDeltaStrategy}}Distributary reconnection is an emerging restoration strategy designed to increase the ability of fish to distribute among delta habitats, and to improve transport of sediment among tidal wetlandsWhere fluvial channels are oversized for their flow, river sediment accumulates.  Large wood may lodge in the sediment, resulting in more sediment deposition and a feedback loop which closes distributary channels in excess of a rivers capacity to maintain.
{{topic}}[[category:river delta]] [[category:delta sediment dynamics and vegetation]]
'''Distributary connections are necessary to spread sediment laden river water to sustain marsh function and delta resilience in the face of sea level riseDistributary systems are commonly simplified or constrained by agricultural and industrial development.'''


River flows may be regulated by our infrastructure, and discharge is anticipated to change with global climate changeAt this time we have not basis for defining a distributary restoration target that is based on a prediction of the number and size of channels that a river delta can naturally sustain over time.
*Distributary configuration affects the routing of sediment, large woody debris and freshwater, and the connectivity of estuarine habitats for fish.
*While some projects may result in distributary reconnection ([[Stillaguamish Delta|Stillaguamish Old Channel]], [[Red Salmon Slough Restoration]], [[Port Susan Restoration]]) and distributary reconstruction projects have been discussed for the [[Skagit Delta]] and [[Snohomish Delta]] and [[Nisqually Delta]], we have limited ability to predict the effects of distributary configuration on sediment deposition.
*[[Fir Island Farm Restoration]] is an example of a project that is more removed from distributary nourishment than other projects in the [[Skagit Delta]]
*Some initial work associated with the [[Nisqually Refuge Restoration]] suggests that low sediment delivery by the river, combined with a weak connection between the river and restoration site is resulting in limited delta accretion. 
*Aerial photo observations associated with the [[Port Susan Restoration]] show loss of marsh area in areas with limited distributary connections, and expansion of marsh area in areas receiving river flood waters.  Ongoing monitoring is describing patterns of sediment deposition across the face of Florence Island.
*The landscape location and the design of levee and dike removal projects may affect wave energy, freshwater and suspended sediment routing, and patterns of salinity intrusion. These may substantially affect the function of existing wetlands. Thus some projects may substantially improve ecosystem resilience to climate impacts by increasing retention of river sediment in wetlandsOn the other hand some actions may create unstable systems, or degrade existing marsh as a new hydrodynamic and sediment regime may result in marsh erosion. 
*Existing projects are commonly located opportunistically, based on landowner willingness, and hydrodynamic design may be poorly informed or constrained by infrastructure or stakeholder interests (like trails development requiring retention of levees). 
*We need exemplary projects that predict and verify the effects of site position and design on off-site marsh formation processes in a way that builds a more generalized project development policy. 
*A river may only support a limited number of distributary channels.  The phenomena of distributary switching has been explored in the Skagit (Need citation).
*[[File:Grossman 2013 delta sediment dynamics presentation.pptx]] summarizes observations of distributary distribution on delta sediment deposition among multiple systems.
*[[Czuba et al 2011]] provides a summary of our current limited knowledge of sediment budgets on major rivers.
*[[USGS]] has been working to increase instrumentation that will allow estimates of annual sediment budget.
*Episodic events may radically change river sediment output, such as the effects of the [[Oso landslide]] on the [[Stillaguamish Delta]].


==Prioritization Analysis==
 
The uncertainty of this topic has resulted in its inclusion in the [[ESRP]] delta restoration adaptive management strategy.  The following analysis supports decision making.
{{ESRPDeltaStrategy}}
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"
|-
|-

Revision as of 03:02, 8 August 2014


Wiki Rules
  • Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
  • Please adhere to our social contract
  • Complain here, and be nice.


Link to List of Workgroups Link to List of Topics Link to List of Places

Link to List of Efforts Link to List of Products Link to List of Documents Link to List of Graphics Link to List of Websites

Link to Headwater Sites Link to Lowland Watershed Sites Link to Floodplain Sites Link to Delta Sites Link to Embayment Sites Link to Beach Sites Link to Rocky Headland Sites

Distributary connections are necessary to spread sediment laden river water to sustain marsh function and delta resilience in the face of sea level rise. Distributary systems are commonly simplified or constrained by agricultural and industrial development.

  • Distributary configuration affects the routing of sediment, large woody debris and freshwater, and the connectivity of estuarine habitats for fish.
  • While some projects may result in distributary reconnection (Stillaguamish Old Channel, Red Salmon Slough Restoration, Port Susan Restoration) and distributary reconstruction projects have been discussed for the Skagit Delta and Snohomish Delta and Nisqually Delta, we have limited ability to predict the effects of distributary configuration on sediment deposition.
  • Fir Island Farm Restoration is an example of a project that is more removed from distributary nourishment than other projects in the Skagit Delta
  • Some initial work associated with the Nisqually Refuge Restoration suggests that low sediment delivery by the river, combined with a weak connection between the river and restoration site is resulting in limited delta accretion.
  • Aerial photo observations associated with the Port Susan Restoration show loss of marsh area in areas with limited distributary connections, and expansion of marsh area in areas receiving river flood waters. Ongoing monitoring is describing patterns of sediment deposition across the face of Florence Island.
  • The landscape location and the design of levee and dike removal projects may affect wave energy, freshwater and suspended sediment routing, and patterns of salinity intrusion. These may substantially affect the function of existing wetlands. Thus some projects may substantially improve ecosystem resilience to climate impacts by increasing retention of river sediment in wetlands. On the other hand some actions may create unstable systems, or degrade existing marsh as a new hydrodynamic and sediment regime may result in marsh erosion.
  • Existing projects are commonly located opportunistically, based on landowner willingness, and hydrodynamic design may be poorly informed or constrained by infrastructure or stakeholder interests (like trails development requiring retention of levees).
  • We need exemplary projects that predict and verify the effects of site position and design on off-site marsh formation processes in a way that builds a more generalized project development policy.
  • A river may only support a limited number of distributary channels. The phenomena of distributary switching has been explored in the Skagit (Need citation).
  • File:Grossman 2013 delta sediment dynamics presentation.pptx summarizes observations of distributary distribution on delta sediment deposition among multiple systems.
  • Czuba et al 2011 provides a summary of our current limited knowledge of sediment budgets on major rivers.
  • USGS has been working to increase instrumentation that will allow estimates of annual sediment budget.
  • Episodic events may radically change river sediment output, such as the effects of the Oso landslide on the Stillaguamish Delta.


Delta Strategy Analysis

ESRPDeltaAMFlag.PNG

The uncertainties in how this topic affects delta restoration has resulted in its inclusion in the ESRP River Delta Adaptive Management Strategy. This three criteria analysis should build off the analysis above, and supports development of learning projects.

Importance Viability Policy Relevance

We are not faced with a large number of urgent distributary restoration actions, however we anticipate that in the larger Snohomish, Nooksack, Stillaguamish, and Snohomish deltas, understanding of distributary connectivity is part of the restoration analysis.

There are limited opportunities for experimental verification of distributary formation and maintenance. This may be largely a modeling exercise, better allocated to individual project feasibility study within specific systems.

Definition of a target distributary state that maximizes performance and resilience of a river delta is a significant policy decision that frames planning, acquisition , and negotiation with stakeholders, as well as the location and scope of future project work.