Continuous Improvement/The Prototype: Difference between revisions
Pcereghino (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Pcereghino (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{| | {| | ||
[[File:CI word cloud.png|200px|left]] | [[File:CI word cloud.png|200px|left]] | ||
|| | ||In November 2018 the [[Ecosystem Coordination Board]] (ECB) agreed that developing "kaizen" mechanisms in Puget Sound recovery could be useful for improving how we do ecosystem management. We agreed that the "coordination community" would be the right group for designing this kind of effort, and understanding whether new capacity is required. | ||
In November 2018 the [[Ecosystem Coordination Board]] (ECB) agreed that developing "kaizen" mechanisms in Puget Sound recovery could be useful for improving how we do ecosystem management. We agreed that the "coordination community" would be the right group for designing this kind of effort, and understanding whether new capacity is required. | |||
We have formed a temporary volunteer workgroup from within the "coordination community", staffed by [[NOAA Restoration Center]]. This workgroup is implementing a rudimentary but functioning continuous improvement process. We envision a four step approach: | We have formed a temporary volunteer workgroup from within the "coordination community", staffed by [[NOAA Restoration Center]]. This workgroup is implementing a rudimentary but functioning continuous improvement process. We envision a four step approach: |
Revision as of 22:57, 30 October 2019
- Salish Sea References
- Ecology Shoreline Photography Viewer
- The Encyclopedia of Puget Sound provides a peer reviewed version of the wiki
- PRISM Project Search
- Washington Coastal Atlas
- UW River History Project
- Wiki Rules
- Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
- Please adhere to our social contract
- Complain here, and be nice.
In November 2018 the Ecosystem Coordination Board (ECB) agreed that developing "kaizen" mechanisms in Puget Sound recovery could be useful for improving how we do ecosystem management. We agreed that the "coordination community" would be the right group for designing this kind of effort, and understanding whether new capacity is required.
We have formed a temporary volunteer workgroup from within the "coordination community", staffed by NOAA Restoration Center. This workgroup is implementing a rudimentary but functioning continuous improvement process. We envision a four step approach:
Our assumption is that continuous improvement of the Ecosystem Recovery System is not optional--our systems are particularly cumbersome and likely to benefit from Kaizen. We will test Steps 1 and 2 of the above proposed system in the Summer and Fall of 2019. We will bring our improvement proposals and system designs back to the ECB and affected institutions in early winter, and aim to work on steps 3 and 4 through the 2020 project development season.
The VocabularyThere is lots of lingo above. It is useful to know how we are using words to represent specific concepts:.
The Workgroup
|