Continuous Improvement: Difference between revisions
From Salish Sea Wiki
Pcereghino (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Pcereghino (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==The Improvement Network== | ==The Improvement Network== | ||
[[file:coordinated investment workflow. | [[file:coordinated investment workflow.png|right|200px]]Our hypothesis is that to implement a efficient continuous improvement in Puget Sound requires simultaneous collaboration among five parties: | ||
#'''The Coordination Community''' must work with local practitioners to look for opportunities to improve the recovery operating environment, and in good faith work with agency programs to identify improvements. | #'''The Coordination Community''' must work with local practitioners to look for opportunities to improve the recovery operating environment, and in good faith work with agency programs to identify improvements. | ||
#'''Agency Programs''' must allocate effort to have good faith conversations with local actors to evaluate strategies for improvement. | #'''Agency Programs''' must allocate effort to have good faith conversations with local actors to evaluate strategies for improvement. | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
==Supporting Materials== | ==Supporting Materials== | ||
[[file: | The following materials | ||
#[[file:Cereghino 2019 DRAFT project description standard workshop output.pdf]] describing findings of project developer/project funder focus group to reduce redundant and conflicting project descriptions over the project lifecycle. | |||
#Video [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4Yheawa6bY pre-workshop briefing] to put project description standard work in context. | |||
#Video [https://youtu.be/5RKsywC46Mo proposal to "Coordination Community"] following ECB agreement to ask coordination community to assist in development of continuous improvement system. | #Video [https://youtu.be/5RKsywC46Mo proposal to "Coordination Community"] following ECB agreement to ask coordination community to assist in development of continuous improvement system. | ||
#[[file:Continuous improvement meeting 3 notes.pdf]] - notes from third ECB sub-committee meeting. | #[[file:Continuous improvement meeting 3 notes.pdf]] - notes from third ECB sub-committee meeting. |
Revision as of 22:13, 12 November 2019
- Salish Sea References
- Ecology Shoreline Photography Viewer
- The Encyclopedia of Puget Sound provides a peer reviewed version of the wiki
- PRISM Project Search
- Washington Coastal Atlas
- UW River History Project
- Wiki Rules
- Wiki text does not reflect the policy or opinion of any agency or organization
- Please adhere to our Social Contract and Style Guide
- Complain here, and be nice.
The Continuous Improvement effort is developing a prototype process for improving how state and federal agency systems that fund, regulate, or organize for ecosystem recovery might improve services to local actors working on ecosystem recovery. It is inspired by Gemba Kaizen theory, initially developed within the Toyota Production System, where improvement opportunities are identified by the people who do the work on the "factory floor" and rapid improvement efforts are enabled through shared practices and encouraged by leadership. We work using the resources we have, because self improvement in an intrinsic part of good government. The current iteration has received support from the Puget Sound Partnership's Ecosystem Coordination Board and is being directed by Lead Entities, Local Integrating Organizations and Ecosystem Recovery coordinators.
The Improvement NetworkOur hypothesis is that to implement a efficient continuous improvement in Puget Sound requires simultaneous collaboration among five parties:
Ongoing Improvement Projects
Supporting MaterialsThe following materials
|